Welcome to Linux Forums! With a comprehensive Linux Forum, information on various types of Linux software and many Linux Reviews articles, we have all the knowledge you need a click away, or accessible via our knowledgeable members.
Find the answer to your Linux question:
Site Navigation
Linux Articles
Linux Forums
Linux Downloads
Linux Hosting
Free Magazines
Job Board
IRC Chat
RSS Feeds


Blag Linux and Gnu (BLAG) is a Fedora Core 3 based distribution of the Linux kernel and Gnu utilities which runs on the x86 processor. BLAG aims to provide a totally free (as in speech) operating system, and it is one of only 5 distributions which are free by the standard of GNU. With this information in hand I thought I'd give it a spin.

First off, the specification of the machine on which I tested BLAG:

- AMD Semperon 2800+
- 502MB RAM
- 19" Dell D1226H CRT display
- Nvidia GeForce FX based graphics card
- Belkin 10/100 network card
- Sony IDE DVD-ROM drive
- Sony IDE CD/RW drive

Installation

After I booted from the CD, I was dropped at a boot prompt, where I was instructed on how to do a default graphical, and default text install. It also gave instructions on how to discover more booting options using the function keys.

Since I wanted the default graphical install I hit enter, and was prompted to test my install CD for errors, which took a minute or two. The CD passed, and I was greeted a few seconds later with the Anaconda installer.

Anaconda is a simple to use graphical installer, very much like YAST on SuSE. It takes you through the install step by step, allowing you options such as a Desktop, Server or Custom install types. The anaconda install can be conducted in a number of languages and keyboard layouts, so people from all over the world should be able to install it easily.

After I booted my BLAG system for the first time I was greeted with a few more configuration pages, where I setup system users, the date and time, my display and sound card. Once this was done I logged into my system.

Usage

I use computers as most of us do, to view the world wide web, read e-mail, write reports and essays, listen to music, play games, and create art.

Gnome and XFCE were installed during the install. By installing both these desktop environments BLAG has given you the choice of using the slightly heavier Gnome, or the lighter XFCE (which can be great if you have an older machine). There are a number of light window managers such as blackbox also available on the CD. One niggly thing about Gnome was the default theme applied; I found it rather dull. The theme applied in XFCE seemed more vibrant and usable, but such cosmetic things are easy to change.

Office - BLAG's install came with AbiWord for word processing, and Gnumeric for a spreadsheet. These are both good applications and seem up to the tasks they were installed for. If you want a fully fledged office suite, there is only one name that comes to mind, OpenOffice.org, it's a pity the developers of BLAG haven't included it on the install CD, but it is available via the apt-get package manager - but this could be a problem if you don't have Internet access and you want to use it.

Other programs that came for the office were an pdf viewer, a label maker and the trusty calculator.

Internet - How would computers be without being able to browse the Internet? Internet wise BLAG comes with the standard packages, the Firefox web browser, Thunderbird for e-mail, gFTP for ftp, xchat and gaim for irc and IM, and BitTorrent and aMule for peer to peer networking. Firefox is one of the best browsers I've used due to its speed, tabbed browsing, and pop-up blocking as well as the wealth of extensions and themes available for it. Thunderbird is also a great application from Mozilla, which handles all my mail and contacts. Gaim is the multipurpose im/irc application, and it's great to see it included due the the number of protocols and services it can handle.

Multimedia - For my collection of music and LugRadio episodes, BLAG comes with xmms and mplayer, which do their job of playing audio well, though I find the xmms interface rather hard to use and also rather old compared with beep media player. Mplayer also lets you play video files, which is nice since you can have all of you multimedia covered by this one application if you wish.

BLAG also comes with audio editing, tag editing, recording, ripping and ipod managing software. Though I haven't needed or used these applications they can be useful for the budding podcaster or musician.

Art - BLAG comes with the GIMP image editing and creation application. The GIMP, is one of the greatest applications ever. The wealth of things you can do with it make it a versatile tool for your desktop. As well as the GIMP you are given the Inkscape SVG Vector Illustrator, which allows you to create and edit SVG files.

Day to day - Day to day one does things like mount partitions, read and write CDs. I managed to mount some of my other disk partitions in BLAG so I could get and write data to them. There was no difficulty in this, but it would have been nice if the partitions were added to the /etc/fstab file during the install so they would mount without user intervention. Burning both data CDs and CD images was a breeze using the Graveman CD burning front end. Graveman isn't a burner I've used before, but I found its interface simple to use, and thus it was easy to burn CDs. Data CDs can be mounted. Therefore, with the freshly burned data CDs, I mounted them to check they'd burned okay; and they seemed to have burned fine.

Configuration and Maintenance - BLAG detected my hardware well, the soundcard configuration worked for my onboard soundcard and display-wise all things seemed to work. I was given a choice of resolutions and I chose 1280x1024, which is great after being stuck at 1024x768 in Gentoo. The only hiccough came with the printer, BLAG detected it (an hp deskjet), but it didn't configure it properly. The Redhat based GUI printer configuration was appalling, so in the end I used the web based configuration available when one goes to localhost:631 in one's web browser.

To maintain the packages you can use either the Synaptic front end for the apt-get package manager, or if you prefer the command line interface, plain old apt-get. Apt-get allows you to update packages as well as install new packages for your system, with its dependency resolving I've found it much more usable than the rpm package manager (which is also installed). Since apt-get is a binary based package manager all updates are very fast. This speed is also useful if you want to install a new application there and then. With a package manager like apt-get it's easy to keep your system under control package wise, and it's updates are useful for security patches and so forth.

BLAG's Freedom - As well as BLAG being free to download, one of the main philosophies that drives it is that of the FreeSoftwareFoundation. This means that all the software that comes on the CDs or are in BLAG's repositories are Free as in freedom - there is no code you can't look at, and no proprietary file formats which lock you into a certain product or company. The slight downside for some is that proprietary software such as Java isn't included anywhere in their package database - this doesn't stop you downloading such packages separately though.

Conclusion - There are some great things about BLAG. Its main asset is its freedom, and being based on a maturer distribution such as Fedora Core 3 has given it an advantage of supplying a stable base from the outset. What makes BLAG different from Fedora Core 3 is its one CD download and its Free credentials, these may not be much for some, but it does make it a distribution to consider seriously.

Pros:

- Free enough that GNU lists it on its website;
- Decent selection of packages on the CD;
- Easy and fast graphical install;
- Apt-get as the main package manager;
- Easy setup for most hardware;
- One CD download.

Cons:

- Didn't set up my printer correctly, and the printer configuration dialogues were appalling - I don't expect this on such an entry level distribution;
- If you don't have Internet access you might be limited by the number of packages on the CD;
- Doesn't automatically put all disk partitions in the fstab file for mounting;
- Dull default theme in Gnome.

Roundup: BLAG is not just a distribution for the Free Software elitist, it may not include non-free software, but it is a fully functioning operating system. You can surf the web, write your essays, and listen to your music, just as you would do with any other operating system. BLAG is a distribution which will install with ease, and be low on hassle. This combined with the fact it's a one CD download, means I'd say BLAG gets 7 out of 10 penguins.

Rate This Article: poor excellent
 
Comments about this article
Review or presentation?
writen by: Psic on 2006-04-03 19:16:25
When reading your review, I had to ask myself if this was a review or just a prestentation. Because you basically present Blag, not really review it. What I mean is that you don't compare it to any other distro, which can make it hard to judge how good it is. There are tons of distributions out there which fit into the "One-cd, apt using, fully featured, desktop live distribution" category. What makes Blag better than Knoppix or Kanotix, Vector or Slax, or plain Fedora Core for that matter, since Blag is based on it (though Fedora does come on more CD's)? There are quite a few things you mention that seem as if you just wrote them down without thinking about them, for instance, you mention "I find the xmms interface rather hard to use and also rather old compared with beep media player". How is the xmms interface hard to use, as it's very basic, if you know how to use a CD player, you're pretty much good to go... And the interface is almost the same as BMP's, especially since you can use the same skins for BMP and Xmms. At least write the reason why Xmms is worse than BMP, and how this affects the distribution. Besides this, I think this site should have someone check the spelling and grammar of the reviews. I'm not exactly a native english speaker, but some grammatical mistakes are pretty bad. One of the worst I noticed was: The GIMP, is one of the greatest applications ever. All in all, I'd say the review could do with some double-checking. It's not bad, but it just needs some more work.
RE: Review or presentation? written by Psic:
RE:
writen by: I.P. on 2006-04-04 11:05:43
Cheers for the comment Psic. When reviewing something I feel I should not compare it with other things, unless I'm reviewing both (or more) things. My reason for this is that I believe a distro should stand up for itself and reviewed against itself and not others. As for the xmms v. bmp interfaces, indeed they are similar, but I personally find bmp's interface slightly more polished to use - though others may think differently. Also bmp seems to have better support for my local language settings, making it easier for me to use. As for the spelling/gammer issues, articles are either peer-reviewed or reviewed by the administrators. Though I agree there should be better proof reading.
RE: RE: written by I.P.:
Thanks!
writen by: jeff on 2006-04-04 17:44:34
Thanks for the nice writeup. :) I'll also add that we have an "alpha" based on FC5 on our FTP site. It's looking quite nice. I'm waiting for FC5 updates to stabilize a bit and for the repos to fill out before releasing a final version. -Jeff
RE: Thanks! written by jeff:
I'll give it a go...
writen by: I.P. on 2006-04-05 10:19:49
I'll give it a go once it's more stable; Iestyn
RE: I'll give it a go... written by I.P.:
Sir James has his say
writen by: James Mirza on 2006-04-09 17:09:16
Have to say, it is a nice review for someone who hasn't heard of BLAG before, I used it a few times, for about 6months and liked it. It's good for desktop use, or someone who doesnt want fedora but wants something based on it (Yes, I was messed up :D) Nice review buddy :)
RE: Sir James has his say written by James Mirza:
Quick comment
writen by: Psic on 2006-04-16 16:59:22
I ran across a relevant article here: http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=06/03/31/1533232 One sentance from the article which stands out is: "...you are not passing judgment on Linux as a concept, you are judging how well it measures up against other operating systems" This is what I meant when I said that you should have compared Blag with distros with similar goals. And I agree with you regarding xmms vs. bmp, I myself use audacious (which is very similar to bmp). I think you could have mentioned the local language settings in your review, since it can be quite useful.
RE: Quick comment written by Psic:
Mr.
writen by: rvgopal on 2006-10-26 13:06:57
I tried Blag as the fourth operating system and second linux OS on my computer, in addition to Ubuntu(KDE also). I am unable to boot into Ubuntu, even after modifying the grub.conf file. Moreover, it did not recognise my floppy disk drive.I have grub as boot loader installed on my mbr. Also Blag does not come with pppoe software which is essential for broadband connections.
RE: Mr. written by rvgopal:
a bit late in the day but...
writen by: salparadise on 2006-10-27 16:59:57
I'm using blag 50002 at the moment. What has drawn me to it is the "entirely open source" aspect. This is not to say that other distros aren't also the same, but, I've heard that RMS (Richard Stallman) has declared there are only two distros that are completely open source (this may have changed since then) and blag is one of them. I've used, over the last 4 years or so, most of the recognisably named distros and blag, for me, has the added political angle. The "comes with" bookmark list in firefox has some sites that have led me to places I never would have found otherwise. I like the political angle as so many companies/corporations these days play the "strictly neutral" game to avoid being branded "right/left wing" etc. What surprises me about Blag is the amount of multimedia that it actually does supoort. Coming as I do from a SuSE 10.1 install with all the codecs, plugins and extras installed I find I can still get to and view/listen to the greater majority of the films and music I have on this computer. In these days of corporate facelessness, moral ambiguity and plain corruption, Blag Linux is a refreshing change.
RE: a bit late in the day but... written by salparadise:
oh for goodness sake...
writen by: salparadise on 2006-10-27 17:01:18
all the speech marks have appeared as something else good grief charlie brown!
RE: oh for goodness sake... written by salparadise:
gentoo
writen by: hmm on 2006-12-12 15:47:09
Your bashing of gentoo is a bad thing
RE: gentoo written by hmm:
multimedia support
writen by: basha on 2007-01-28 09:28:20
though i have been using the blag for some time and upgraded it to 60000 but what i found that VCD do not run on this system
RE: multimedia support written by basha:

Comment title: *Please do not reply to comments here.
*You must be logged in to comment.