Results 1 to 9 of 9
Running Xubuntu and can't decide on which html editor to use.
Bluefish is nice and simple but Quanta Plus seems to have more features. Like being able to parse the ...
- 07-16-2008 #1Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Farnborough, UK
- Posts
- 1,305
Bluefish or Quanta Plus?
Running Xubuntu and can't decide on which html editor to use.

Bluefish is nice and simple but Quanta Plus seems to have more features. Like being able to parse the pages through apache on localhost and a nice quick visual tab.
Anyone have a preference?
Or any alternatives?
- 07-16-2008 #2forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,088
I like Bluefish when running Gnome, and Quanta Plus when running KDE.
oz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.
- 07-17-2008 #3
I like Komodo Edit. Linky
If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)
My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.
- 09-02-2008 #4Just Joined!
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Posts
- 5
You should try Komposer. It's (imo) the best webdesign tool for linux. It's also in the repositories.
- 09-02-2008 #5
I prefer Quanta, but lately I have been using Aptana Studio. You will need java to be installed because its built on Eclipse.
- 09-02-2008 #6Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Farnborough, UK
- Posts
- 1,305
- 09-02-2008 #7Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Farnborough, UK
- Posts
- 1,305
- 09-02-2008 #8Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Location
- Farnborough, UK
- Posts
- 1,305
- 09-03-2008 #9Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- Córdoba (Spain)
- Posts
- 1,513
I just use a regular editor. I don't need any integration with apache nor things like that. I can have a live view of my site on a browser window on a separate workspace (I have a browser always open anyway, so...). Kate is particularly good since the kio integration makes it possible to edit remote sites on a live fashion.
I also don't understand why would I have to use a different editor depending on my desktop.
Like most things, this is all about tastes. Each one has his/her own formula here, as in most things.


Reply With Quote

