Results 11 to 20 of 20
I do use the x86_64 Arch and there's no lack of programs. The last real piece of the puzzle came when adobe released a 64 bit flash player. You can ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 04-02-2009 #11
I do use the x86_64 Arch and there's no lack of programs. The last real piece of the puzzle came when adobe released a 64 bit flash player. You can also still install 32 bit libraries to get the few holdouts, like Skype, working. Though I would rather use open source software for VoIP like Ekiga.
I used to use Sidux and I do really like it. (Though it's ugly as hell out of the box.) But GNOME support is lacking and they're still at KDE 3.5 as well. Which is no fault of theirs - those packages aren't in Debian Sid yet. You could install the XFCE version and then install GNOME via APT, though I don't think they even have GNOME 2.24 in Sid yet, and 2.26 has just come out! I'm more of an XFCE guy myself, so it wasn't a deal breaker with Sidux for me. But I still prefer Arch.
- 04-02-2009 #12Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 34
- 04-02-2009 #13I don't mind helping out, but did you consider just googling "sidux"? Mirrors :: sidux.com :: debian based live cd developmentWhere can i get a CD image of Sidux??
And hey, looks like KDE 4.2 could be in Debian Sid within a week. Debian and KDE4: Good Things Come to Those Who Wait - Linux Magazine Online
- 04-02-2009 #14Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 34
- 04-02-2009 #15
They have a KDE CD and a XFCE CD. Helpful hint, distrowatch always links directly to an ISO download when they do a release annoucement. DistroWatch.com: Put the fun back into computing. Use Linux, BSD.
- 04-02-2009 #16Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 34
- 04-02-2009 #17Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 34
Ok, i found and started DLing 64bit XFCE and i have a question.
If i download Gnome off repo cant i easely upgrade since its running an older gnome via gnome tar file
- 04-02-2009 #18
No. I'm not sure even sure where to begin explaining why not. Read this to start: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallingSoftware It's for Ubuntu but still mostly applicable.
The tar files you're talking about are probably the source code. Installing your desktop environment from source would destabilize your system, if you managed to succeed at all. The sidux website says keeps it brief
Sidux is very specific about what it supports for upgrades and installs. For example, even upgrading using synaptic or aptitude is not supported. This is to maintain the integrity of the system. Remember, it follows the unstable branch of Debian, which is, well, unstable. Deviating from their recommendations, especially since you're inexperienced in linux, will lead to breakages.Debian variants, Source and RPMs
Source installs are not supported. If you really need to compile your application, do it as user, and put it under your home directory without installing it to the system. Using checkinstall and converting RPMs with alien (and others like it) to a deb are not supported.
Debian variants often use different file locations for various applications which could cause system instability and some packages won't install due to unresolvable dependencies from different package naming schemes or odd version numbers. For instance a different version of glibc could cause the application to not even run.
- 04-02-2009 #19Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 34
If they are using unstable how do they still not have support for Gnome this makes no sence. Idk about changing OSs, especially when you cant even install the DE you want. I guess ill just get the Ubuntu 9.04 Beta.
- 04-02-2009 #20
Look, the project is run by volunteers and their focus isn't GNOME. If you want GNOME, learn how to package and maintain it and give back to the community.


Reply With Quote
ill go try to find it on there site... thx for the help so far...

