[SOLVED] gparted or parted magic?

[aetiv]

I have never used either gparted or parted magic in the live disk form and was wondering what one seems to work the best. I have:

gparted live .4.6-1
Parted Magic Live 4.8

I need to move some partitions (and the data contained) around in an external usb hard drive. There are ext3 and NTFS on there at this moment. I need to make a few more NTFS partitions to back up some data on a Win server. What recommendations does everyone have?

[devils casper]

GParted and PartedMagic are same. Both are Graphical Interfaces of tool parted.
GParted interface is GTK based and PartedMagic is QT based.
I prefer PartedMagic LiveCD because it has lot of other tools which make it A Perfect Rescue CD.

[oz]

GParted interface is GTK based and PartedMagic is QT based.

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I thought Parted Magic was GTK based since it contains gparted, and that it was qtparted that was QT based.

Either way, I personally like Parted Magic because of all the great utilities on the disk including gparted, but I've never cared for qtparted on those occasions that I've had to use it.

[aetiv]

Thanks to the both of you. I have never used either as a live disk, but I have used gparted during a Linux run state. I'll give the Parted Magic a shot.