Results 1 to 2 of 2
I installed User Mode Linux in laptop. but not start or work.
i use that code to install
(used OS is Redhat 9)
Code:
#rpm -ivh user_mode_linux-2.4.19.5um-0.i386.rpm
#gzip -d root_fs.rh-7.2-server.pristine.20021012.gz
...
- 11-24-2004 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 4
User mode linux not start (in redhat 9)
I installed User Mode Linux in laptop. but not start or work.
i use that code to install
(used OS is Redhat 9)
when i excute last code UML must be start and requere to login. (I read HOWTO and i think that but maybe i understand worrong) but it say something. like that:Code:#rpm -ivh user_mode_linux-2.4.19.5um-0.i386.rpm #gzip -d root_fs.rh-7.2-server.pristine.20021012.gz #linux ubd0=root_fs.rh-7.2-server.pristine.20021012 eth0=tuntap,,,192,168,0,254
what should i do. what is wrong to it.Code:tracing thread pid = 1693 Linux version 2.4.19-5um (jdike@uml.karaya.com) (gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-81)) #2 Mon Sep 16 15:41:15 EDT 2002 On node 0 totalpages: 8192 zone(0): 8192 pages. zone(1): 0 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Kernel command line: ubd0=root_fs.rh-7.2-server.pristine.20021012 eth0=tuntap,,,192.168.0.254 root=/dev/ubd0 Calibrating delay loop... 461.50 BogoMIPS Memory: 30192k available Dentry cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Inode cache hash table entries: 2048 (order: 2, 16384 bytes) Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Buffer-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Checking for host processor cmov support...Yes Checking for host processor xmm support...No Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK Checking that host ptys support output SIGIO...Yes Checking that host ptys support SIGIO on close...No, enabling workaround POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Initializing RT netlink socket Kernel panic: outer trampoline didn't exit with SIGKILL
- 11-25-2004 #2Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 4
i found my mistake. it was ./linux. because it cannot access with new linux directory.
thanks all. it was very deficult to know that error.


Reply With Quote
