Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread: (drinking) wine problems
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
(drinking) wine problems
On another thread i asked about a linux software that played compressed archive files (e.g. mp3 album on a .rar file)... it seems there isn't one (no, Amarok doesn't support KIOs). Therefore i got foobar2000 working in wine.
The problem is that i get plenty of "glitches" with Wine. In windows playback was always smooth and sweet like ahh... smooth and sweet things
I need to do 2 things:
1) increase wine priority for the specific foobar2000 "thread"
2) deny any network access to foobar2000 (it isn't open source so...)
P1) i'm not having any luck with nice
I tried sudoers: me ALL=(ALL) /usr/bin/nice
Also tried a shell script with suid bit set
And another thing, since linux dynamically changes processes priorities, isn't there any way to avoid that process' priority from being changed?
P2) I used Sygate in windows which gave me a lot of control over programs. With iptables things are more complicated :/
I know there is -m owner --cmd-owner but this doesn't seem to work very well.
Are there any jails (à lá BSD) in Linux?
Another option i see is creating a specific user for wine programs. But is this safe (spyware, overflows, etc)?
Thank you for your time and suggestions.
This issue was discussed here in the wine wiki. They referenced a patch which contains this comment:// When wineserver is suid root this patch will make games that require SetThreadPriority for audio work correctly.
I believe Linux implements the equivalent of BSD jails with the chroot command. Here is a somewhat old Chroot-BIND HOWTO.
I never heard of sygate before, but there are sooo many extended packet matching modules for iptables that I would be surprised if there is something you can't do. I've never tried to us 'owner' module, but I'm not even sure what the command name of a wine program would be. I wonder if it would be the windows exe name (case sensitive?, w/ or w/o .exe?) or maybe wineserver.
If you just want to spy on the process, wineshark (formerly ethereal) is a good tool that is include in major distros.
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
Thank you for your replies KenJackson. Now for the status of my situation:
I applied the patch you mentioned, the results are better than with the unstable version of the Debian package, but i still get plenty of hiccups when switching tabs in firefox or scrolling the window.
It's funny then mention suid'ing wineserver, as it doesn't work because wineserver creates a socket owned by root that needs to be accessed by the user. Still, i tried to run it as root (i'm just playing with linux ATM, after learning how to get things working i will reinstall this box) but it still didn't worked.
I think my next manhood challenge will be compiling a new kernel. I read some bits that with kernel 2.6.17 latency issues are handled better (i'm with 2.6..
Sygate is a windows firewall, not an iptables module :P
And i guess you wanted to mention wiReshark instead of wiNeshark hehe