Results 21 to 29 of 29
I thought this was a rather good read on the matter. ITPro: Applications: Features: SCO's estranged relationship with Linux...
- 08-14-2007 #21
I thought this was a rather good read on the matter. ITPro: Applications: Features: SCO's estranged relationship with Linux
Registered Linux user # 395739
direplay.com
- 08-15-2007 #22I do not respond to private messages asking for Linux help, Please keep it on the forums only.
All new users please read this.** Forum FAQS. ** Adopt an unanswered post.
- 08-15-2007 #23
Unqualified good news, meaning it's good, plain and simple. There are no "but wait!" strings attached as far as I'm concerned. Some have brought up that considering the deals Novell made with Microsoft, this should somehow be a hollow victory. I do not agree. This is a success for the FOSS community. We should be celebrating, not nitpicking the side deals made by Novell.
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 08-15-2007 #24I do not respond to private messages asking for Linux help, Please keep it on the forums only.
All new users please read this.** Forum FAQS. ** Adopt an unanswered post.
- 08-15-2007 #25
- 08-31-2007 #26forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,082
SCO appeals Unix ownership decision
SCO might have gone down in flames as stated in the original article, but it appears that the fire has arisen again from the dying embers:
SCO appeals Unix ownership decisionoz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.
- 09-01-2007 #27Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- The Hot Humid South
- Posts
- 602
It can appeal all it want, doesn't mean they're going to win this time around. The original ruling was done during summary judgement, which means there wasn't even a trial, the judge pretty much said "You have no leg to stand on!" All they are saying now is "yes, we do have a leg to stand on", which is a long way from "we're right".
"Today you are freer than ever to do what you want, provided you can pay for it!" --Bad Religion
- 09-03-2007 #28
SCO have no choice but to appeal as they'd be ruined if they don't (besides, appealing seems standard in law these days).
Here's why Linux is easier than Windows:
Package Managers! Apt-Get and Portage (among others) allow users to install programs MUCH easier than Windows can.
Hardware Drivers. In SuSE, ALL the hardware is detected and installed automatically! How is this harder than Windows' constant disc changing and rebooting?
- 09-03-2007 #29
I'll never be able to understand why companies like SCO are so keen on litigation. You would think acting that way would damage their reputation...
They might suppose that they have a lot to gain from a successful claim, but after the way they've acted I would go a long way to avoid their products / services.
In the meantime the creative and knowledgeable Linux community (and we are a community) just carries on, going from strength to strength. We can all play a small part in making this thing rock!
It's not about 'developers, developers, developers'. It's about community, community, community.I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso


Reply With Quote


