Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Whats's the difference between the following distros? 1. RedHat and RHEL 2. SuSE and openSUSE 3. Linspire and Freespire? Why do people prefer the purchased version on the download version ...
  1. #1
    Linux User
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    458

    What's the diff?

    Whats's the difference between the following distros?

    1. RedHat and RHEL
    2. SuSE and openSUSE
    3. Linspire and Freespire?

    Why do people prefer the purchased version on the download version of the free one? What makes them different?
    "When you have nothing to say, say nothing."

  2. #2
    Trusted Penguin Roxoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Posts
    3,391
    The purchased one comes with support. Businesses like this, it gives them predictable fix times when things don't work right (yeah, I know this is garbage - but as the IT Idiot here at work says - 'I get someone to shout at').
    Linux user #126863 - see http://linuxcounter.net/

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    52
    The above is correct but also the free versions tend to have more "cutting edge" apps than their paid for counterparts. In the business world stability is much more important than cutting edge. Applications also receive wider and more indepth testing to ensure they will stand up in an enterprise environment.

  4. #4
    Linux Guru techieMoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,496
    Quote Originally Posted by usamamuneeb View Post
    Whats's the difference between the following distros?

    1. RedHat and RHEL
    There is none. Redhat (the company) distributes one product: Redhat Enterprise Linux, otherwise known as RHEL. The distribution formerly known as Redhat was discontinued several years ago. Any non-commercial distribution work was shifted off to the Fedora project.

    2. SuSE and openSUSE
    Again, there is no difference because SuSE by itself no longer exists. openSuSE is the free community product (similar to Fedora), whereas Novell now sells the commercial SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop, otherwise known as SLED.

    3. Linspire and Freespire?
    Not a whole lot. You get a membership in the Click N Run warehouse when you purchase Linspire, but that's about the extent of it. Both distributions offer the same multimedia playback support.

    Why do people prefer the purchased version on the download version of the free one? What makes them different?
    Different people find different things valuable. I purchased SuSE 9.1, 9.2, and 9.3 from a retail store for roughly $49.99USD a piece. Why? I liked the professionally-printed discs, the helpful manuals, and the fact that I didn't have to spend time downloading a 2 DVD/5 CDROM set of discs. I also appreciated the idea that I was supporting a distribution I enjoyed.

    When it comes to business distributions like SLED and RHEL, people pay for support first and foremost. If you sign a contract with Redhat or Novell, it comes with a guarantee that your IT department will have someone they can call to fix bugs, issue patches, and help configure your systems. That's something that is simply not available with most free distributions because it costs money to staff those support folks.
    Registered Linux user #270181
    TechieMoe's Tech Rants

  5. #5
    Trusted Penguin Roxoff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Nottingham, England
    Posts
    3,391
    Quote Originally Posted by ennoil View Post
    The above is correct but also the free versions tend to have more "cutting edge" apps than their paid for counterparts. In the business world stability is much more important than cutting edge. Applications also receive wider and more indepth testing to ensure they will stand up in an enterprise environment.
    Yeah, that too...

    It's not so important for a company to have the latest version of mplayer or xmms installed on its web server.
    Linux user #126863 - see http://linuxcounter.net/

  6. #6
    Just Joined! LinuxZealot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    beautiful Seattle Washington
    Posts
    34
    Asking which one is better here is like asking a preist a rabbi and a bhuddist monk who's got the better religion, or asking a biker and a motorhead weather you should buy a sports car or a motorcycle. My best suggestion is research on your own looking for features that you desire in your operating system along the lines of work (or play) that you intend on using your machine for. Each of these distros has a website, and many of these websites provide short comparisons. Or, if your feeling bold. try them out for yourself. the best way to learn is to DO!

  7. #7
    Linux Enthusiast apoorv_khurasia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Laurasia
    Posts
    624
    Quote Originally Posted by Roxoff View Post
    The purchased one comes with support. Businesses like this, it gives them predictable fix times when things don't work right (yeah, I know this is garbage - but as the IT Idiot here at work says - 'I get someone to shout at').
    Its not totally garbage, you see. If I were running a business, I need people who can take responsibility for their product. Since most Linux cos are not good at this stuff it is not too difficult for cos like IBM or Microsoft to market their stuff (you have to acknowledge MS is pretty good with support). Redhat also provides good support.

    P.S.:- Take Responsibility (Hunt & Thomas in The Pragmatic Programmer)
    "There is no sixth rule"
    --Rob Pike
    Registered Linux User: 400426 home page

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •