Using dream research for computer technology

[Lordshooter]

Using dream research for computer technology


My opinion is:

1.)We can start focusing only on how we get a picture, while dreaming.
2.)One of the main facts is, that we can see pictures, that a dream is running like a video, tv-film, or movie film.


These are already pretty much interesting facts.

It is already very amazing, how we get a very good picture on our tv screen. First analog, and today digital.

Research about dreams, is, to say it very frankly, only at its very beginning.

There must be a few ways to do research about dream.

And from all what I was ever able to hear and read about dream research, nobody just focused on, how we get the clear pictures.

The pictures we can see in a dream, are not unclear, are not nebulous, and not fuzzy:
No, we mostly get them cristall-clear, and even better than we ever can get to see on a tv-screen.

This is, from my point of view, one of the most important facts within all the dream research that scientists do.

It would be interesting to try to transfer such same processes that our brain does, into a technology
that reproduces pictures on to a panel.

What also is the case, in a dream is, that the picture is a tree dimensional picture: We are in and on the scene, or „film“ that is running.

If you get such a three dimensional feeling while watching tv at home, you will get a totally other experience.

Think about it:

If all pictures, we get to watch form a screen, resemble the same type of picture we get in our dreams...

What would happen?

This is like: Reality coming closer to what dreams are. And dreams coming closer what we can also get in reality.

The gap between reality and dream, gets smaller.

If fact the way we dream, is a real fact,

Wile researching about dreams, the dream is part of our real world, is a real thing, and is reality.

How real, and how much reality are dreams, therefor?

We tended to have two pots: the one pot with all the reality content inside of it, and the other pot with all the dream content in it. And we took the dream pot less seriously, and we did not know, what actually to do with all of the content inside of the dream pot/container.

Probably there is no such thing as a gap between reality, and the way we are able to receive our dream picture. Speaking only about the receiving process, like we receive tv.

I am not talking about the content of the film, not about the content of the dream.

I am only talking about how we can receive and see tv, respectively, how we can receive and see a dream while asleep.

There is therefore a little bit more reality in the dream issue of dreams during sleep, than we where able to take seriously.

If you compare the quality of the dream-show, with the quality of a tv-show: Then, the dream-show is way ahead, and presents a outstanding picture quality, and a outstanding feeling and experience of looking at „moving pictures“.

From the days of the silent movie, to our days, with poor results in dream research: We are not that far ahead as we thought to be.

There is much too much showing-off and bluffing within science, and not enough real scientific spirit.
The spirit and enthusiasm it needs to achieve and to get the better results within reasonable time.

Thank you for your attention, and enjoy watching tv, as well as dreaming while you are asleep.


Kind regards,
Alexander

[Lordshooter]

Another few interesting thoughts and facts:

Your brain is a "all in one"-"computer", what concerns the output of a dream:

It produces a "film/movie".

It receives the film.

It shows the film.

It watches the film. Meaning, you watch the film. Meaning, that you are dreaming while you are asleep.

As we know, the processes in our brain, are chemical processes.

Not so, those in a computer.

To be able to benefit from the same useful processes that are going on in our brain, we would have to invent a method to transform chemical process into ones that we can use in a operation system of a computer.

Translation and transforming "Ways of production A", to "Way of our familiar production B", which is our computer operation system.

Or: Which is a operation system, or our television. It is just about "getting, receiving and watching movies", basically.

The movie, or the "Dream-Movie" (what we get to see in our dreams), becomes a new scientific touch and importance.

At the end, finally, we could have better technology for computing, by analyzing and using these fields of source of knowhow.

Basically, we have to first understand, how these processes work in our brain, than we can go over to studying how we can translate chemical processes into computer processes, so that it might work for the computer as well, and not only for our brain.

...But..., well, we might not necessary need to have a film-studio inside of our computer, that could take place somewhere else, in some server computer, but it is the receiving-, the showing-, and the watching-aspect, that are most interesting. Just a other technology, a nicer experience.

So many things our brain is capable to do, have been tried to be copied into everyday handling processes outside of our brain, but not many of those attempts where able to successfully function.

Looking at it this way, we should actually also get back to our brain, appreciate and train its good and useful functions, if we sometimes have nothing better than our own brain to do certain things.

And then let the good working parts work together: For example brain and computer. - What we are actually already doing today.

But can we do it better?


Thank you, and have a nice weekend.


Alexander

P.S.:

The "movie-like"-pictures, are not the same, as pictures we create during memorizing.

The memory pictures, come sometimes expected, and sometimes unexpected.

The "dream-film", always comes unexpected, and you can't choose whatever film or program you wish to see. It is just a dream, that you get that way, and have to except.

Either you decide to watch it till the end. Or if you get fed up with watching it, you could try to get enough control, and wake up: You wake up, and your dream gets interrupted, and is finished.

In fact there is a scientific field about how to get in a similar to dream state, while being awake:

Listening to so called "alpha music", which sends alpha waves to your brain. Etc., etc.

The whole issue, is also about being able to concentrate better, by being more like in a "alpha" state of your brain.

To be able to get the "dream-quality-movies", you would have go to bed, sleep, and wait till you fall into the last phase of your sleep, and start having dreams.

Then wait and see, what sort of dream you get, and what the "show" is all about.

After waking up, you might be able to remember some things about the dream(s) you had.

Possibly, some very useful material...

[Lordshooter]

Further, I say:

The content of a dream (that you get while sleeping) is not of much importance.

But everything else about a dream, about how dreams get to be dreams, are of high interest.

This is why:

You have a „film-studio“ in your brain, that produces, what you finally get to see in your dreams.

Every film production studio has to get some sort of material to make a story for the film.

The film studio in your brain, can only take from the sources that are there, that are stored in your memory.

You don't have influence, in how the producer inside of your braind decides to make the film.

The films, their contents, etc., are in no way different, from the ones that are made in real life:
A lot of them are weird, crazy, confusing, brutal, etc.

This is why one should not take the content of a dream too seriously, analyze it too much, or just worry about it: No: Not so good.

Trying to analyze and explain the content of a dream, must, inevitably, be misleading, and resulting into very wrong conclusions. So again: No good.

We should not get lost in that issue.

The issue is still about the dream, but only about how a dream gets to be what is. Just the production techniques, not the story.

How we are able to receive and see dreams (like turning on tv), is indeed remarkably highly interesting, so I suggest, to only look at this, but to not wast any time about the content (story) of a dream.

Some scientists think for a much to loong time, that it is worth analyzing a specific issue, but they are only wasting their time, because all the output of their work, will be mostly useless.

A film that just gets made, just fore the reason that there must be a film, might result in a quality film, with a nice setting, but which a boring and uninteresting story.

The problem with the films made in our head, is that the filmmaker decides about what to make, and that we don't take any influence.

The film-producer does not communicate with you before, and ask you, if the story should be based on some nice experiences that you where able to make lately.

If he decides to make a horrible film, and you get to see it, it probably will upset you, and it might disturb that part of your sleep.

There we have, what we call the „nightmare“...

We could, though, ask our selfs, why we have a film-studio, and how we could be able to watch films that are more pleasing to us,

Anyway:
I think I have handled the dream issue enough, and I would like to leave it up to others to make their thoughts.

And I invite some scientists to take another look at this issue, and possible revise some of their theories.


Alexander

[Oxygen]

A-what now?

[elija]

Hello alcohol my old friend

[Agent-X]

Go study mathematics, chemistry, physics, biology, neuroscience, physiology, computer science, programming, neural networks, and come back later and notice how jumbled/amature your thread was. But, it's nice to see another dreamer.

I'm sure there is someone working on it. I think the concept would be more advanced than what would have been seen in an episode of Cowboy Bebop, during which a character was hooked up to a dream machine to display the person's dream. It would have to be a wetware implant, in my complete assumption.

But yeah, we are seriously reaching the age of The Matrix. I can truly envision how to teach someone martial arts in perhap 5 days. Not in 50 minutes, though. You'd burn out the brain. You'd deplete the body of calcium ions and so many other things...