Quote:
Originally Posted by Oxygen I heard their motherboards were unreliable and didn't work well with Linux. |
I've heard nothing of the sort, but...
Over the last 10 years or so, my server has been running Asus motherboards, from the lowly P2B-D up to it's current dual P3 1GHz thingy.
For my desktop machine, I selected Asus mainboards for each of the last 3 or 4 board upgrades, ever since my PCChips dual P2 (slot1) mainboard was sold on. When my missus' computer needed an upgrade maybe 3 years ago, I got it a P4 Asus mainboard (not by choice this time, but because someone offered me a package at a good price) and her recent upgrade (at the same time as mine) to dual-core athlon 64 AM2, went into an Asus board for a very good reason...
I get that to be at least 8 new computer mainboards by Asus that I've purchased through that time, with a variety of Intel and AMD chips. All these machines ran Linux of some sort or another, from RedHat 6, 7.1/7.2 and on, through various Fedora and CentOS flavours; they all worked.
Out of all that there was only one device that I didn't have working - the network port on one of my desktop mainboards which was just too damn new when I bought it. It was 6 months till the drivers were available. By this time, it'd got an RTL8139 compatible utterly-ubiquitous-network-card in it, which I didn't take out.
All these machines were stable; my P2B-D server mainboard was only supposed to run 2xP2 slot 1's at 500Mhz (100MHz FSB), that's all the BX chipset was supposed to handle. But of course, this was an Asus mainboard, so I overclocked the BX chipset to 133Mhz and ran 2x P3 733's in there for over five years. I upgraded that a few months ago, just after new year.
Asus goes with Linux very, very well in my experience.