| I'm using CentOS 5.1 -
I started back in 98 with MKLinux DR3 (based on RH 5.1) and have pretty much been using RH based distros ever since, though I have played with Debian, SuSE, Mandrake (I guess that's RH based), LFS, etc.
LFS was by far the nicest system to use once I had it built, but keeping it at patch level was a real chore.
I was using Fedora - and I fell in love with Fedora Core 6. I didn't bother with F7. When F8 was released, FC6 reached EOL and Fedora 8 was just a complete nightmarish blunder of a release, IMHO it needed about 3 more months of QA and bug fixes. I'm sure it will be a great system in a few months, but I just got sick of it - and switched to CentOS which won't be EOL any time soon. I can upgrade to CentOS 6/7/whatever when I damn well feel like it.
Anyway - so I voted for RPM.
I'm very familiar with RPM but for me, the package manager is just a tool, not a reason to pick a distro. None of the package managers at this point suck so much they should be avoided, all do a fine job when the user doesn't do something stupid. |