Welcome to Linux Forums! With a comprehensive Linux Forum, information on various types of Linux software and many Linux Reviews articles, we have all the knowledge you need a click away, or accessible via our knowledgeable members.
Find the answer to your Linux question:
New to Linux Forums? Register here for free!
    Linux Forums > The Community > The Coffee Lounge > Favorite Distro for Older/Weaker Hardware - 2008

Forgot Password?
 The Coffee Lounge   General chat about anything that goes, a good place to introduce yourself and say hi, tell a Joke, or just relax.

Site Navigation
Linux Articles
Linux Forums
Linux Downloads
Linux Hosting
Free Magazines
Job Board
IRC Chat
RSS Feeds


Linux Forum Topics
Linux Forums
Your Distro
Linux Resources
GNU Linux Zone
The Community
View Poll Results: What is your favorite Linux distribution for older/weaker hardware?
Arch 2 2.78%
Damn Small Linux (DSL) 17 23.61%
Debian 14 19.44%
Puppy 12 16.67%
Slackware 10 13.89%
Vector 4 5.56%
Zenwalk 4 5.56%
Other (please list below) 9 12.50%
Voters: 72. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-15-2008   #11 (permalink)
Linux User
 
Agent-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dimension X
Posts: 261
I'd say go with a lower kernel and work your way up.
Otherwise, it's about specializing the kernel for the computer.
Linux From Scratch seems like a really good idea.

MuLinux -> Damn Small Linux -> Puppy Linux -> Debian

I'm still hoping for a day when tons of programs will be created with ncurses, and that idea of an X server will seem silly. After using Linux for a while, I can see why people argue about the X server.

I'm sure most oldbies truly think all this graphical stuff is nonsense, and it could be simplified down somewhat.

In my view, the Xserver is only necessary for viewing pictures. I mean, if you remove the idea of graphic-intense games from your head. With that in mind, that's how I think of putting Linux on an old computer. The OS shouldn't bog the computer, and it should run decently fast. I'd say Damn Small Linux's programs do well in that department. DSL is limited, but serves its purpose.

I keep reading about web browsers that can be text-based, like lynx or w3m, and they use some kind of framebuffer if you need to look at an image. I guess the idea is saving on system resources and using them only when you really need to. Of course, the less system resources you use, the faster you can have the computer.

FrameBuffer UI - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________
Agent-X is offline  


Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008   #12 (permalink)
Linux Guru
 
jayd512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 1,595
A while back, I put DamnSmall on a PC that used to run Windoze 95 and it works like a charm!
__________________
Jay

Forum Rules
Registered Linux User #463940
Not every story has an ending... but they all have more chapters.
jayd512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008   #13 (permalink)
Just Joined!
 
the0wl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 0
Send a message via ICQ to the0wl
I'm using Ubuntu 7.10 on an old Dell GS 100 tower with a 1GHz CPU and 265MB RAM. Admittedly, its a bit slower than may Acer 3050 laptop with a 1.7GHz CPU and 1GB RAM, but its still quite functional.

Cheers;
Ed
Registered Linux user 449064
the0wl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008   #14 (permalink)
Linux Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Here. There. Anywhere.
Posts: 115
Send a message via AIM to ryokimball Send a message via Yahoo to ryokimball
Quote:
Originally Posted by the0wl View Post
I'm using Ubuntu 7.10 on an old Dell GS 100 tower with a 1MHz CPU and 265MB RAM. Admittedly, its a bit slower than may Acer 3050 laptop with
One Megahertz?!
ryokimball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008   #15 (permalink)
Just Joined!
 
the0wl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 0
Send a message via ICQ to the0wl
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by ryokimball View Post
One Megahertz?!
Heh... My Freudian Slip is showing... 1GHz.

Cheers
the0wl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008   #16 (permalink)
Just Joined!
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
Deli linux

I got Deli to install on a Toshiba Tecra 740CDT. 80MB RAM, 2GB HD, with a floppy and CD.
It uses a ports tree for updates, so you can compile pretty much anything you want after that.
festus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2008   #17 (permalink)
Linux Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Hot Humid South
Posts: 602
I would generally vote for either Slackware or Debian, but after quite some testing I found DSL is really the best for older PCs. One of the things that I've noticed is that, in older computers, HD space can sometimes be a problem. With this in mind, there's not many distros except DSL or Puppy that can deal with that.

I've also used DeLiLinux a while back and liked it, specially since it's not a LiveCD (I don't really like them for everyday use). I'd recommend it with my eyes closed as well.
__________________
"Today you are freer than ever to do what you want, provided you can pay for it!" --Bad Religion
bidi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008   #18 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Dapper Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Sovereign State of South Carolina
Posts: 4,136
Send a message via AIM to Dapper Dan
This page got pointed to by another thread so please don't think I'm trying to resurrect the dead. I think this thread still has a lot of advice to offer new users looking for minimal distros for older hardware. I'd also like to add that I've used DSL and Puppy both. My hat goes off to both of them for providing distros that work well with older slower hardware. I'd like to add into that mix, DelLi Linux which is a really good choice for similar computers. I understand BeatrIX is back on the move again. It's another worth considering.
__________________
CRUX 2.5 + IceWM Registered:#371367 New Members: click here
Dapper Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2008   #19 (permalink)
Just Joined!
 
vigol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tehran - Iran
Posts: 13
Send a message via Yahoo to vigol
I voted to Slackware, but It's better to start from scratch.
Build all that you need to fit your needs.
vigol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008   #20 (permalink)
Content Team
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 100
I think this poll is rather vague. You need to LIST the hardware before talking about distro for it. And old can often be a relative term - both a Pentium 4 HT 3.8GHz and a Celeron 1GHz can be called Old.

Anyway, on MY own rig, with 256MB DDR 400MHz RAM, 2.66GHz Pentium 4 Prescott without HT, Intel D915GLVG with onboard graphics and audio, and an 80GB Samsung SATA HDD, Arch is the perfect option, with IceWM and KDEmod.
__________________
A man learns from his experience. A smart man learns from the experience of others, while a smarter man experiences life after knowing other's experiences.

BE THE SMARTER MAN.
MetalheadGautham is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Free Magazines
Run Your Own Web Server Using Linux & Apache - Free 191 Page Preview
Learn about everything you'll need to build and maintain your Linux servers, and to deploy Web applications to them.
subscribe
Open Source Security Myths Dispelled
Dispel the five major myths surrounding Open Source Security and gain the tools necessary to make a truly informed decision for your IT organization
subscribe
InformationWeek
InformationWeek is the only newsweekly you'll need to stay on top of the latest developments in information technology.
subscribe



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 AM.






© 2000 - 2009 - All Rights Reserved - Property of  MAS Media

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC2