Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 7 of 7
There's a news story today about a guy that retrieved data from a disk drive that had been on the Columbia space shuttle when it burned up on reentry in ...
  1. #1
    Linux Enthusiast KenJackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    506

    Columbia space shuttle used DOS

    There's a news story today about a guy that retrieved data from a disk drive that had been on the Columbia space shuttle when it burned up on reentry in 2003.

    [T]he 340-megabyte drive was only half full, and the damage happened where data had not yet been written.

    Edwards attributes that to a lucky twist: The computer was running an ancient operating system, DOS, which does not scatter data all over drives as other approaches do.
    DOS!?
    On the space shuttle?
    Now there's some advanced technology for ya.

  2. #2
    Linux Guru techieMoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,496
    I work for county government and the vast majority of our criminal justice data is stored on a mainframe and retrieved using COBOL programs.
    Registered Linux user #270181
    TechieMoe's Tech Rants

  3. #3
    Linux Enthusiast carlosponti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    560
    its probably not the same dos that you know of being in IBM pc's. The mainframe when i was going to school was running DOS VSE and was no where near the same thing as DOS. DOS was a common name for OS's back when QDOS and Microsofts Version of DOS came about.
    Blog
    Registered Linux user 396557

  4. #4
    Linux Guru fingal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Birmingham - UK
    Posts
    1,539
    I'm surprised, but not that surprised. I remember watching a programme on TV about a satellite (many years ago now) and they mentioned that it had an onboard computer. A 386 no less! At the time I was using a 386 at home and at work, and I knew its limitations.

    I bet a lot of people on here own kit which is capable of a lot more than just home computing.
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso

  5. #5
    Trusted Penguin Dapper Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Sovereign State of South Carolina
    Posts
    4,562
    I've used DOS and Windows while running radio automation. Between the two, if I had to stake my life on one or the other's dependability, I'd choose DOS hands down.
    Linux Mint + IceWM Registered:#371367 New Members: click here

  6. #6
    Linux Enthusiast KenJackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    506
    OK, OK, I know no one in his right mind would use Windows on a critical system like the shuttle. (A crash might make "blue screen of death" take on a whole new meaning.) But DOS isn't the only other option. And I'm not even talking about Linux or *BSD.

    There are a bunch of real-time OSes that are used in critical systems. There's Quadros RTXC, Green Hills Integrity, QNX, Wind River VxWorks, and others.

    The space program is kind of a synonym or metaphor for the cutting edge of technology. So I'm surprised to have a DOS computer on a shuttle in any context. If it's not exactly the MS-DOS of the 80's, it's probably not all that different. It sounded like it was using a FAT file system.

  7. #7
    Linux Newbie Geeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane Aus
    Posts
    176
    It's not to surprising for me.
    From what I recall must satalites use a VERY basic version of debian, as in old as all hell.

    Bank systems here in Australia are all based on systems that were setup around 1960 and everything runs from that.

    http://www.australianit.news.com.au/...-24169,00.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •