Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
The install went really well. It even played my MP3 collection out of the box. Flash was easy to install and I have installed the msttcorefonts so that things look ...
  1. #1
    Trusted Penguin elija's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Either at home or at work or down the pub
    Posts
    2,288

    Well, I'm posting this from Debian

    The install went really well. It even played my MP3 collection out of the box.
    Flash was easy to install and I have installed the msttcorefonts so that things
    look better.

    I decided that the software offered by Etch was way too old and Sid was
    probably going to be a bit dangerous so I went for Lenny which I think is a good
    compromise.

    Still running Gnome, although I did try Fluxbox but decided it would be too much
    like hard work.

    Debian seems fast compared to Ubuntu / Mint et al and somehow I feel like I have
    gone up a level

    ***Removed question - using Firefox instead of Iceweasel ***
    If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)


    My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator devils casper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Chandigarh, India
    Posts
    24,316
    Well Done and Congrats elija !
    I am using Debian for last seven months and it working fine without any problem. Iceweasel is a clone of FireFox only. There isn't any difference in both except Logo. Wiki article on naming conflict.
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit.
    New Users: Read This First

  3. #3
    oz
    oz is offline
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    18,082
    It's been quite some time since I last installed Debian, but I always liked it better than any of the *buntus. Hope it continues to work well for you.
    oz

    new members/users: read this first | new member faq
    no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
    please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.

  4. #4
    Linux User IsaacKuo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA, USA
    Posts
    292
    Instead of fluxbox, you could try icewm. Use "apt-get install icewm icewm-themes".

    Icewm is faster and lighter than fluxbox, and has a more familiar interface. GNOME applets like nm-applet work in IceWM.

    You don't really need to do any configuration on icewm at all, unless you want to. Just choose your desired theme.
    Isaac Kuo, ICQ 29055726 or Yahoo mechdan

  5. #5
    Linux Enthusiast Manchunian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    France but my heart stays in Britain
    Posts
    675
    Ha! Knew it! I knew you'd do this one day! Great isn't it?
    Distribution: Archlinux
    Processor: 3 x Amd 64 bit
    Ram: 4 GB
    Graphics card: Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT

  6. #6
    Trusted Penguin elija's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Either at home or at work or down the pub
    Posts
    2,288
    Quote Originally Posted by IsaacKuo View Post
    Instead of fluxbox, you could try icewm. Use "apt-get install icewm icewm-themes".
    Holy Cow! That's fast!

    Just one question - how do I set a background image? I can't find this icewmbg
    that Google keeps throwing up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Manchunian View Post
    Ha! Knew it! I knew you'd do this one day! Great isn't it?
    I'm definitely having fun
    If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)


    My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.

  7. #7
    Linux Enthusiast Manchunian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    France but my heart stays in Britain
    Posts
    675
    I've never tried IceWm - well, not properly. Is it really faster than Fluxbox? Fluxbox is already pretty damn fast.
    Distribution: Archlinux
    Processor: 3 x Amd 64 bit
    Ram: 4 GB
    Graphics card: Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT

  8. #8
    Trusted Penguin elija's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Either at home or at work or down the pub
    Posts
    2,288
    It is very fast. I don't really know if it is faster than fluxbox I knew right away
    that I didn't like it. I'm not 100% sure about Icewm, but it seems I am at least
    prepared to try.

    What's really odd now that I come to think about it is that I don't actually know
    why I almost instantly didn't like it
    If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)


    My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.

  9. #9
    Linux User IsaacKuo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA, USA
    Posts
    292
    Quote Originally Posted by elija View Post
    Just one question - how do I set a background image? I can't find this icewmbg that Google keeps throwing up.
    You almost certainly already have icewmbg; it's part of the icewm package. In order for it to actually "do" something, you need to either have a background specified in ~/.icewm/preferences or you need to use a theme with a predefined background.

    First, create a new directory ~/.icewm/ if it doesn't already exist. Actually, the easiest way to make sure it exists is to simply change the IceWM theme from its menu. This will create ~/.icewm/theme if it doesn't already exist (as well as the directory ~/.icewm/ if necessary).

    Second, go to /usr/share/icewm/. This is where the default config files are stored. If you want to customize them, copy the files you want to customize to your ~/.icewm/ directory. The ones I customize are "preferences", "menu", and "toolbar".

    There are a couple GUI utilities for editing your icewm preferences, but I prefer simply editing the files directly with a text editor. The setting for the background image is near the bottom of ~/.icewm/preferences.

    After making any changes to the config files, you can use the icewm "logout" submenu to restart IceWM. This will put all changes into effect EXCEPT for the background image. One way to make the background image change is to open up a terminal and type in the command "icewmbg" (you don't have to restart icewm). Then press <ctrl-c> to kill icewmbg; after it has set the background its job is done anyway.
    Isaac Kuo, ICQ 29055726 or Yahoo mechdan

  10. #10
    Linux User IsaacKuo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA, USA
    Posts
    292
    Quote Originally Posted by Manchunian View Post
    I've never tried IceWm - well, not properly. Is it really faster than Fluxbox? Fluxbox is already pretty damn fast.
    I have no idea how to benchmark it, but fluxbox seems to take a split second longer to switch between windows or workspaces, and it seems to take just a bit longer to open up an application.

    I guess all I can definitively say is that you can try it out and compare for yourself. On both sides of the comparison, the theme will affect performance. On the fluxbox side, I tried using the "minimal" style. On the IceWM side, I tried using "IceCrack2"--which might not be the smallest/fastest theme but it's my favorite and it's pretty small/fast.

    Soon I'm going to try my hand at making my own small/fast/elegant IceWM theme.
    Isaac Kuo, ICQ 29055726 or Yahoo mechdan

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •