elija

I don't think they are doing anything particularly sinister. As a programmer I can tell you that while reasonably accurate database searching is easy, very accurate and relavent database searching is hard. Searching the web is somewhat trickier.

These are probably teething troubles. I would suggest that you report the searches that turn up unexpected porn or other potentially nasty results along with the relavent links. That way, if it isn't the sinister thing, you can help them improve the engine. If it is the sinister thing, at least you will know.

I agree with you completely about kids with kids, drugs, knives and guns but I blame the education system and I'll leave that topic here as it has the potential to descend into a real rant and politics are rightly not allowed in these forums!

__________________
"I complement you - your facility of understatement is exceeded only by your mastery of silence, but measuring this with the word 'shame' surpasses all your previous achievements in articulation"

The Fifth Continent

Sporkman

Here's a writeup on Cuil's launch:

Technology Review: A Google Killer Stumbles

fingal

Thanks for the link. I'm surprised by some of the stuff in that article:
There's no doubt about this. Relevance (or 'relevancy' if you're an information scientist) is absolutely the most important quality.
No! Relevancy matters. Size is only useful if it contributes to relevancy, otherwise it's useless.

Maybe these ex Google employees know less than we've been led to believe... Or maybe they just wanted a lot of money to play with.

I was taught that the 2 key aspects of an information search are relevancy (as mentioned above) and recall. People looking for information want 'just enough' recall to have some useful results to search for, but high relevancy within a given set of hits. Cuil currently produces high recall with very low relevancy and is therefore useless to an information professional.

Geeky link - the term used here is 'precision' but same difference.

__________________
I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso

cousinlucky

Thank You for the link, Sporkman.

Thirty-Thrree Million Dollars is a lot of money. What was promised to people to convince them to provide that much capital for C.U.I.L to come into existence??

A relative of mine claims that the most lucrative ( moneywise ) websites are the websites dealing with, and promoting, pornography. I do not doubt his statement. The listings that I clicked in C.U.I.L. were, I thought, legitimate firefox links because they presented themselves that way.

In its advertising C.U.I.L stresses that it is not going to keep any records of anyone's searches done while using its service. That may be good advertising but I do not understand how they can make such a claim in light of the fact that the U.S. government requies every phone company and ISP to install a tracking system.

I will never go back to the C.U.I.L. website even if they clean up their act in the future.

__________________
Linux registered user # 414321
You Should Not Give In To Evils, But Proceed Ever More Boldly Against Them!! -from book six of Virgil's Aeneid
http://www.paynal.com