Results 101 to 110 of 253
00:25:14 up 16:16, 1 user, load average: 1.04, 1.01, 1.00
is my server's uptime... sleeping in the same room i can't let it on all night, besides nobody but me ...
- 04-02-2005 #101Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Gland, Switzerland
- Posts
- 3
00:25:14 up 16:16, 1 user, load average: 1.04, 1.01, 1.00
is my server's uptime... sleeping in the same room i can't let it on all night, besides nobody but me accessing the machine, so not really useful if i'm sleeping
- 04-03-2005 #102Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 609
This as the result of a printing-problem.Code:10:55:59 up 18 days
Maximum would be somwhere around 7-9 months, as I reinstall the machine when a new version of Fedora comes out (mostly +1 month after release, when I worked with it for some time on my own computer).
- 04-06-2005 #103Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Union, SC
- Posts
- 34
uptime vs downtime
had my HP Apollo workstation up for almost a year then the monitor went out an it has not been on since. That was a year ago.
- 04-06-2005 #104Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 609
Re: uptime vs downtime
Although I didn't have the same experience, but that was one of the reasons I got a KVM-switch and now my server and my own workstation are on the same keyboard/monitor/mouse. And I can tell you... that's working so easy
Originally Posted by nwoods29321
- 04-09-2005 #105Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 2
Uptime - 340+ days
We have a box at work that's been up more than 340 days. We'll take it down soon to upgrade from RH 9.0 to FC3.
- 04-10-2005 #106Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 205
liberalapotheosis% uptime
20:06:05 up 8 min, 2 users, load average: 0.29, 0.28, 0.15
- 04-12-2005 #107Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Sydney, Australia
- Posts
- 5
sadly enough my windows server at home has had the best uptime of all my pc's...
*Hides behind server rack to avoid being hit by flames
Last reboot 32 days ago. My record has been 123 days, before it needed a reboot.
But that is only because my *nix server is still being setup and my nix desktop has a dodgy psu.
But this shows some stability, albeit on bsd, those top servers have been running almost 5 years without a rebooot(one wonders how well their hardware is doing after three years)
http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html
- 04-12-2005 #108Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Posts
- 609
Originally Posted by changlinn
Don't be to sad about it. Just disconnect and fire up your Linux server and we'll talk about it next year
- 04-12-2005 #109Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- YYC
- Posts
- 9
This is my longest uptime so far. It's a Mandriva 10.0 box. Its last outage was a power failure. I'll have to restart it to upgrade to Mandriva 10.1 and do some maintenance to the watercooling system at the same time.Code:[skid@whisky skid]$ uptime 15:42:18 up 248 days, 17:50, 0 users, load average: 2.23, 2.05, 2.02
Updated:
I finally had to shut it down last week to top up the coolant. And believe me, I was racking my brain to try and think of ways to top it up without shutting it down. heheheCode:[skid@whisky skid]$ date Tue May 24 18:16:13 MDT 2005 [skid@whisky skid]$ uptime 18:16:13 up 290 days, 20:24, 0 users, load average: 1.52, 1.89, 1.96
Skid
- 04-13-2005 #110those results are flawed, here is the explanation;
Originally Posted by changlinn
Linux, Solaris, HP-UX, and some versions of FreeBSD only record up to 497 days of uptime, after which their uptime counters are reset to zero and start again. So all web sites based on machines running Linux, Solaris, HP-UX and in some cases FreeBSD "appear" to reboot every 497 days even if they run for years.
the site does explain that in the faq's, but since they record windows aswell then the results can't be anything more than skewed as i know from experience that people will just come along and take the results at face value



