View Poll Results: Which filesystem you are using?
- Voters
- 23. You may not vote on this poll
-
ext2
1 4.35% -
ext3
14 60.87% -
ext4
4 17.39% -
Reiser
2 8.70% -
XFS
1 4.35% -
JFS
1 4.35% -
other
0 0%
Results 21 to 29 of 29
...
- 06-01-2009 #21Linux User
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Posts
- 414
- 06-01-2009 #22
ha ha .. darkrose0510 that's really funny
but scary too
- Lakshmipathi.G
-------------------
FOSS India Award winning ext3fs Undelete tool and tutorials www.giis.co.in
First they criticize you,Then they laugh at you,Then they fight with you,Then you win. - M.K.Gandhi
-------------------
- 06-01-2009 #23
ROFL! But aw! You owe me a new keyboard
Can't tell an OS by it's GUI
- 06-01-2009 #24
Oh my...
Wonder how long will it take for me to reach that stage...
What exactly do you mean by small files and big files.. could you please explain... where in a system we find these...
What do you mean by 'commit time'?A candle looses nothing by lighting other candles. - Khalil Zibran.
Registered Linux User #490076
- 06-01-2009 #25Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Dover, NH
- Posts
- 1,633
How often the journal is updated to the disk. By default, it's kept low (5 seconds) so at any crash there's almost no data loss. Obviously, this has a negative effect on an SSD life, so the object becomes to balance life and effectiveness. You can use the commit= option in the fstab to change this default value. Setting a higher value improves performance and disk life, however, also increases the amount of work that could potentially be lost in a crash or power failure. For SSDs, I've seen a recommendation of 60 seconds (-o rw,commit=60), which will cut writes in 1/12th keeping close to a normal drive life span, while still maintaining an acceptable risk factor for the data on the disk.What do you mean by 'commit time'?
List of ext3 options: Linux Kernel Documentation :: filesystems : ext3.txt
Edit:
There's also the option to place the journal on a different disk, say if you have one of those netbooks with several SD slots, you can in theory tie one up using an inexpensive SD card for your journal.
- 06-01-2009 #26
Yes I used LFS to build a bootable base from which to build upon. I've built my own distro so many times that the book has become more like a rough guide. For instance I was using gcc4, glibc 2.4, and the sanitised kernel headers long before they were entered in to the book; basically I went in blind and fixed whatever issues came up - for which there were quite a few. I'm actually working on a new distro at the moment, I finished compiling X the other day and that's turned out well.
- 06-01-2009 #27
I'm talking about the size of the files. In a typical distribution you will have lots of small files - such as configs, libraries, binaries, logs, etc - in contrast to an FTP that might contain lots of 10M+ tarballs. XFS is meant to be great for large files - which makes it good for use on, i.e., FTPs - and JFS is great for small files - i.e., a system with a typical distribution or a server.
- 06-03-2009 #28
I use ext3. I'll wait until ext4 has been around a little while before I try it.
I keep my music files on a FAT32 partition. And very briefly, my iPod was formatted with hfs+. **shudder**
- 06-03-2009 #29
Have always used ReiserFS and Ext3 mostly but have been using XFS a lot recently.


Reply With Quote

