Find the answer to your Linux question:

View Poll Results: Which filesystem you are using?

Voters
23. You may not vote on this poll
  • ext2

    1 4.35%
  • ext3

    14 60.87%
  • ext4

    4 17.39%
  • Reiser

    2 8.70%
  • XFS

    1 4.35%
  • JFS

    1 4.35%
  • other

    0 0%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 29 of 29
...
  1. #21
    Linux User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    414

  2. #22
    Linux Guru Lakshmipathi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    3rd rock from sun - Often seen near moon
    Posts
    1,568

    Smile

    ha ha .. darkrose0510 that's really funny but scary too
    - Lakshmipathi.G
    -------------------
    FOSS India Award winning ext3fs Undelete tool and tutorials www.giis.co.in
    First they criticize you,Then they laugh at you,Then they fight with you,Then you win. - M.K.Gandhi
    -------------------

  3. #23
    Linux Engineer Freston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,047
    ROFL! But aw! You owe me a new keyboard


    Can't tell an OS by it's GUI

  4. #24
    Linux User saivin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bengaluru, India
    Posts
    305
    Quote Originally Posted by Krendoshazin View Post
    I use JFS. The benefit of building my own distros is...
    Oh my... Wonder how long will it take for me to reach that stage...
    Quote Originally Posted by Krendoshazin View Post
    However, I saw some benchmarks for JFS and decided to give it a try; it's meant to be better for smaller files whereas XFS is better for big ones.
    What exactly do you mean by small files and big files.. could you please explain... where in a system we find these...

    Quote Originally Posted by D-cat View Post
    BTW: you can use ext3 on a SSD, but you need to drop your commit time from the default 5 seconds to something less demanding to the drive, examples suggest 60 seconds.
    What do you mean by 'commit time'?
    A candle looses nothing by lighting other candles. - Khalil Zibran.
    Registered Linux User #490076

  5. #25
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Dover, NH
    Posts
    1,633
    What do you mean by 'commit time'?
    How often the journal is updated to the disk. By default, it's kept low (5 seconds) so at any crash there's almost no data loss. Obviously, this has a negative effect on an SSD life, so the object becomes to balance life and effectiveness. You can use the commit= option in the fstab to change this default value. Setting a higher value improves performance and disk life, however, also increases the amount of work that could potentially be lost in a crash or power failure. For SSDs, I've seen a recommendation of 60 seconds (-o rw,commit=60), which will cut writes in 1/12th keeping close to a normal drive life span, while still maintaining an acceptable risk factor for the data on the disk.

    List of ext3 options: Linux Kernel Documentation :: filesystems : ext3.txt

    Edit:
    There's also the option to place the journal on a different disk, say if you have one of those netbooks with several SD slots, you can in theory tie one up using an inexpensive SD card for your journal.

  6. #26
    Linux User Krendoshazin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by Lakshmipathi View Post
    Can you share how you built your own distro?
    Yes I used LFS to build a bootable base from which to build upon. I've built my own distro so many times that the book has become more like a rough guide. For instance I was using gcc4, glibc 2.4, and the sanitised kernel headers long before they were entered in to the book; basically I went in blind and fixed whatever issues came up - for which there were quite a few. I'm actually working on a new distro at the moment, I finished compiling X the other day and that's turned out well.

  7. #27
    Linux User Krendoshazin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by saivin View Post
    What exactly do you mean by small files and big files.. could you please explain... where in a system we find these...
    I'm talking about the size of the files. In a typical distribution you will have lots of small files - such as configs, libraries, binaries, logs, etc - in contrast to an FTP that might contain lots of 10M+ tarballs. XFS is meant to be great for large files - which makes it good for use on, i.e., FTPs - and JFS is great for small files - i.e., a system with a typical distribution or a server.

  8. #28
    Just Joined! Artesia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    83
    I use ext3. I'll wait until ext4 has been around a little while before I try it.

    I keep my music files on a FAT32 partition. And very briefly, my iPod was formatted with hfs+. **shudder**

  9. #29
    Trusted Penguin Dapper Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Sovereign State of South Carolina
    Posts
    4,562
    Have always used ReiserFS and Ext3 mostly but have been using XFS a lot recently.
    Linux Mint + IceWM Registered:#371367 New Members: click here

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •