View Poll Results: Which filesystem you are using?
- Voters
- 23. You may not vote on this poll
-
ext2
1 4.35% -
ext3
14 60.87% -
ext4
4 17.39% -
Reiser
2 8.70% -
XFS
1 4.35% -
JFS
1 4.35% -
other
0 0%
Results 1 to 10 of 29
Which filesystem you are using?
For Linux I use normaly ext3, for Data-Partition NTFS so I have access from Windows as well....
- 05-30-2009 #1Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 128
Which filesystem you are using?
Which filesystem you are using?
For Linux I use normaly ext3, for Data-Partition NTFS so I have access from Windows as well.
- 05-30-2009 #2
I voted ext4 as I am running it on my system disk. My data is held on another drive and mounted into my "Documents" folder and that drive is ext3.
I don't have any Windows machines so that would be all.If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)
My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.
- 05-30-2009 #3
I'm currently using ext3 on all my Linux boxes.
- 05-30-2009 #4forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,080
ext3 works really well for me.
oz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.
- 05-30-2009 #5
I prefer ReiserFS.
No Windows machines that are my personal property, but I do have a couple of FAT# formatted USB sticks, SD cards and an external drive. I'd change that, but compatibility becomes an issue then. Certain proprietary Operating Systems can't handle anything but FAT and NTFS.Can't tell an OS by it's GUI
- 05-30-2009 #6
I use ext3 on all distros I run. Frankly, I use it by default, not as a conscious decision weighing pros and cons of each of them.
Freston, I heard ReiserFS is not maintained anymore mostly coz Reiser is no more.A candle looses nothing by lighting other candles. - Khalil Zibran.
Registered Linux User #490076
- 05-30-2009 #7Reisers ex-wife is no more, and that's why Reiser is in prison
Originally Posted by saivin 
I'm not really sure how the development will continue, but I probably could have known if I had searched a little though. Still, I'm not to worried about the file system. I'll read up on progress next time I have to do an install. And otherwise I've heard good things about JFS and XFS but maybe I'll have a look at EXT4.Can't tell an OS by it's GUI
- 05-30-2009 #8
I like saivin use the defaults usually. When it calls for ext3 I use it. When it calls for ext2 I use it also. I've heard some hype on ext3 being hard on SSD drives. Supposedly the file system wears out SSD drives Faster. Don't know yet how true that statement is yet. Haven't researched it enough yet.
Linux Registered User # 475019
Lead,Follow, or get the heck out of the way
AntiX,Puppy,Ubuntu,Windows 7=(cuz of scooters)
Open CourseWare for Linux Geeks
- 05-30-2009 #9
I wish ext4 had shipped with intrepid...I loved it in Jaunty but with the bugs I faced in Jaunty had to give it up....don't have the time to force ext4 to work in 8.10 otherwise I would....I was amazed with the specs on ext4 vs 3 and even against NTFS)
Bodhi 1.3 & Bodhi 1.4 using E17
Dell Studio 17, Intel Graphics card, 4 gigs of RAM, E17
"The beauty in life can only be found by moving past the materialism which defines human nature and into the higher realm of thought and knowledge"
- 05-30-2009 #10
I voted ext3 because I use it for most of my partitions - root, home, data all with data journaling set on. I use reiserfs for var when I create a separate /var partition (my understanding is it gives better performance for small files). I'd risk root and /home on ext4 but data stays on ext3
.
I use ntfs for the Windows XP partition I still have on one machine ... since I'm down to a single application actually requiring XP installed for (rather than running in a VM) I don't really need a separate data partition - more space for ext3
.


Reply With Quote
