Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 14 of 14
Here are some benchmark speed tests I did with OpenOffice in Crux: Time to load Office wrapper: 7-8 sec Time to load openWrite/openCalc from wrapper: 7-8 sec Time to load ...
  1. #11
    Linux Engineer hazel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Harrow, UK
    Posts
    951

    Thumbs up Some speed tests for Crux

    Here are some benchmark speed tests I did with OpenOffice in Crux:

    Time to load Office wrapper: 7-8 sec
    Time to load openWrite/openCalc from wrapper: 7-8 sec
    Time to load openWrite/openCalc from command line: 12 sec
    Time to load openWrite from openCalc: 5 sec.

    That is bloody amazing! I remember that in Ubuntu it took well over half a minute to load openWrite. So I gave it up and used abiword and gnumeric instead. For the kind of simple spreadsheets that I use, gnumeric is as good as openCalc, but abiword is definitely not a patch on openWrite.

    I can see why Crux is fast: it doesn't have 20 different daemons running by default in the background. I'm curious to know if one gets similar results on Arch, which has a similar philosophy. Any Arch fans out there want to do the same test?
    "I'm just a little old lady; don't try to dazzle me with jargon!"

  2. #12
    Trusted Penguin Dapper Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Sovereign State of South Carolina
    Posts
    4,562
    hazel, I love Gnumeric and have been using it for years on many boxes! It is almost impossible to crash!
    Linux Mint + IceWM Registered:#371367 New Members: click here

  3. #13
    Linux Guru reed9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    4,651
    I haven't timed it, but unofficially, openoffice opens comparably fast under Arch.

    Arch also only runs daemons you explicitly tell it to run, I think the same way as in Crux. In Arch, there's a daemons array in /etc/rc.conf - I think Crux calls it services?

    I'm running pekwm with Arch on my Dell Mini 9, and unless I have firefox open, memory consumption is usually around 90 MB. That's with a fair number of daemons loading, wicd, openssh, openntpd, slim login manager, hal, and a couple others I can't recall right now.

  4. #14
    Linux Engineer hazel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Harrow, UK
    Posts
    951
    Spent the whole of yesterday installing cups and associated programs (ghostscript, foomatic-filters, hpijs) and getting it to work. Initially I couldn't print anything; no matter what type of file I tried, I always got the same error: "Application/xxx not supported". I googled and found that this is a common problem but without a specific solution. Some people got round it by commenting out part of their /etc/cups/mime.convs file (unfortunately they didn't say which part); others had to remove the whole caboodle and reinstall.

    I didn't want to do that for obvious reasons so I copied the mime.convs file from Debian. I have never had any problems printing in that system. And it worked. The errors disappeared. Of course I still had to set up my printer. That meant recompiling the kernel to get an lp module to load. And I learned that you don't define a printer yourself because you'll never get the address right; you let cups find the printer for you, which it will do once lp is loaded.

    Today I tried again and discovered that now cups works with the original Crux mime.convs file as well as with the Debian one. So why didn't it yesterday? Computers are not logical.
    "I'm just a little old lady; don't try to dazzle me with jargon!"

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •