Results 1 to 10 of 159
I have created a extremely minimal linux (without GUI) Its comes around 3MB.
(Still at alpha state-Yet to release first version - can't connect to remote machines..yet to need these ...
- 09-14-2009 #1
Extremely minial linux
I have created a extremely minimal linux (without GUI) Its comes around 3MB.

(Still at alpha state-Yet to release first version - can't connect to remote machines..yet to need these packages in next version)
Do you think it will be useful? Or Added GUI will be more useful than current one?
I know there is plenty and plenty of good minimal linux distro out there.
I just want to try my own for fun - it may be useful for educational purpose
- Lakshmipathi.G
-------------------
FOSS India Award winning ext3fs Undelete tool and tutorials www.giis.co.in
First they criticize you,Then they laugh at you,Then they fight with you,Then you win. - M.K.Gandhi
-------------------
- 09-14-2009 #2
I don't know about useful, but it would be interesting to try and boot Linux from a couple of floppy disks, just for fun.
- 09-14-2009 #3
Holy. Does that use a full kernel (the last of which seemed to be 40MB in apt)? Or a compressed, cut-down one?
- 09-14-2009 #4
Wow impressive!
Maybe I'm a bit biassed, but I'm hardly able to compile a kernel under 3MB (kidding, I've got it down to 2MB). Anyway, I'm trying to get an image of ~250MB (less is better but 250 will do) that has a GUI and can NFS and SSH with X forwarding.
How hard would it be to add X, IceWM and some networking capability to that?[/blatant_self_interest]Can't tell an OS by it's GUI
- 09-14-2009 #5
Damn Small did it. That has X, and is only 90MB.
I wonder if 250MB could fit GNOME, apt, the base system, and a barebones OO.org...
- 09-14-2009 #6Debian GNU/Linux -- You know you want it.
- 09-14-2009 #7
- 09-14-2009 #8
Sounds like an interesting project lakshmi.
- 09-14-2009 #9
- 09-15-2009 #10
yeah,that will add more funbut it would be interesting to try and boot Linux from a couple of floppy disks
Yes,it's configured (cut-down/customized) version .I have complied the kernel without support for modules and removed unneccessary modules.Holy. Does that use a full kernel (the last of which seemed to be 40MB in apt)? Or a compressed, cut-down one?
I think It won't be hard to add X, IceWM or xfce - over it,but it needs a proper compiler .I'll try and explore adding X and networking in coming days ,Freston.Wow impressive!
Maybe I'm a bit biassed, but I'm hardly able to compile a kernel under 3MB (kidding, I've got it down to 2MB). Anyway, I'm trying to get an image of ~250MB (less is better but 250 will do) that has a GUI and can NFS and SSH with X forwarding.
How hard would it be to add X, IceWM and some networking capability to that?[/blatant_self_interest]
hazel, i have created a static kernel , so added required modules are build into the kernel itself. So that it won't need to load themI assume the modules tree in Lakshmipathi's version is bzipped.
- just wanted to keep it in small.
Thanks BemkSounds like an interesting project lakshmi.
Robin,great to hear that will be usefulSounds good for me.
I can really use your project.
However I'd add the C Compiler Toolchain, SVN and a wrapper script to add a package manager of some form
I feel really good to see positive response,I thought It won't be received well (Since we have so many excellent small distros ,out there)
As i said,It mainly intended for educational purpose.So I'm writing document about how I created this minimal linux,which helpful for all of us.- Lakshmipathi.G
-------------------
FOSS India Award winning ext3fs Undelete tool and tutorials www.giis.co.in
First they criticize you,Then they laugh at you,Then they fight with you,Then you win. - M.K.Gandhi
-------------------


Reply With Quote

