Find the answer to your Linux question:

View Poll Results: QT or GTK

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • Only GTK, I'd refuse to install QT

    6 33.33%
  • Only QT, I'd refuse to install GTK

    0 0%
  • I prefer GTK, but I don't mind polluting..

    3 16.67%
  • I prefer QT, but I don't mind polluting..

    1 5.56%
  • I use both at the same time, either is fine..

    7 38.89%
  • Other, please comment..

    1 5.56%
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
Hey All, I am doing a little research on how people use Linux in the Graphical Sense of way. I for example only use GTK.. I don't like/want to install ...
  1. #1
    Linux Engineer RobinVossen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,422

    QT or GTK

    Hey All,

    I am doing a little research on how people use Linux in the Graphical Sense of way.
    I for example only use GTK.. I don't like/want to install QT.. I don't miss it however there is maybe one app that I would like. Then I'd prefer to run that app on WINE over installing QT and Polluting my system with it..
    I have also heard that people think the same way about GTK.
    So Would you kindly answer this Poll for me please =)

    How do you prefer it?
    (Edit: Its an OpenPoll as I am interested in who Votes what.)
    New Users, please read this..
    Google first, then ask..

  2. #2
    Linux User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    414
    Same, I only use gtk.

    The exception being if a friend is having problems with a qt app, I'll install it to try to reproduce the problem... but it's gone soon after.

    I also don't use wine, and lately don't use anything that's not native 64bit (like some games).

  3. #3
    Linux Engineer RobinVossen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,422
    But you already have the QT Librarys installed then I assume?
    So your system already holds QT.
    New Users, please read this..
    Google first, then ask..

  4. #4
    Linux User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by RobinVossen View Post
    But you already have the QT Librarys installed then I assume?
    So your system already holds QT.
    me? no. uninstall everything that's not needed. Although now I've all but stopped using a package manager I probably just won't install it at all.

  5. #5
    Linux Guru techieMoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,496
    Quote Originally Posted by RobinVossen View Post
    Hey All,

    I am doing a little research on how people use Linux in the Graphical Sense of way.
    I for example only use GTK.. I don't like/want to install QT.. I don't miss it however there is maybe one app that I would like. Then I'd prefer to run that app on WINE over installing QT and Polluting my system with it..
    You're more likely to pollute your system with WINE than Qt.
    Registered Linux user #270181
    TechieMoe's Tech Rants

  6. #6
    Linux Engineer RobinVossen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,422
    heh truetrue.
    But I need WINE Anyway (since of Bejewled*shameshame* and some applications I need for my music band.)
    New Users, please read this..
    Google first, then ask..

  7. #7
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    152
    I prefer QT over GTK, but I don't have any issues on use both. At programming level, I prefer QT too, in my opinion, a much better framework than others.
    EOF

  8. #8
    Linux Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Dover, NH
    Posts
    1,633
    But I need WINE Anyway (since of Bejewled...
    You haven't found Gweled yet? The graphics aren't as fancy but the game play is the same.

    The QT vs GTK argument had more merit in the past when QT wasn't a purely open library; GTK was legitimately favored. Now that it has been relicensed under (L)GPL, the whole thing is moot. I actually have a preference for QT/KDE, but both libraries are installed and I have a ton of programs written for both frameworks. As long as the programs get along, I see no reason to complain.

    If anything should be avoided, it is WINE. I recognize though that it can be a necessary evil to some (or rather the Windoze programs running under it). It is slower and allowing Windows programs to execute in any environment has its own risk factor, especially in terms of "pollution."
    Last edited by D-cat; 12-01-2009 at 02:34 PM. Reason: adding links

  9. #9
    Linux Engineer hazel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Harrow, UK
    Posts
    951
    I don't like the word "pollute". I use gtk because the first Linux desktop that I ever used was gnome (which I hated by the way) and I've never used KDE. Also I'm used to gtk for programming. I don't want to install qt as well because I have limited disk space.
    "I'm just a little old lady; don't try to dazzle me with jargon!"

  10. #10
    Linux Engineer RobinVossen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,422
    Quote Originally Posted by D-cat View Post
    You haven't found Gweled yet? The graphics aren't as fancy but the game play is the same.
    No the play is way different as first off there are no Hyper nor those other exploding Crystals. the Highscore is buggy and the score isnt compatible with my friends



    @All,

    Thanks for the reactions. I got to say I notice GTK is bigger not much QT Fans. However most of you agree on the fact that using WINE is more evil then mixing QT and GTK
    New Users, please read this..
    Google first, then ask..

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •