View Poll Results: What is your favorite Linux distribution for older/weaker hardware?
- 49. You may not vote on this poll
Damn Small Linux (DSL)
Other (Please Specify)
Results 1 to 10 of 36
This poll/thread is meant to help those users that are having difficulty deciding which distribution(s) they should use to work with their older/weaker computer. Please use it to post information ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 12-28-2009 #1
Favorite Distro for Older/Weaker Hardware - 2010
Please use it to post information about your favorite distro for older/weaker hardware. Do not post comments saying that any particular distro is the best, because the best truly is very subjective.
Note that this thread will be locked and/or deleted at the end of the year and a new thread started.
The poll from last year can be found here.
- 12-28-2009 #2
Previous years I have voted DSL, this time I voted Arch. I just can't get over the login as root in Puppy, and DSL refused to recognise network cards for me.
Arch lets you just install what you want, and is binary rather than source based. For old hardware compile times are a real pain, days to compile Gentoo rule out source based distros for me.
Debian would also probably be good for old hardware.
If your connected to the net then it needs to be patched - even if it runs on old hardware.
- 12-28-2009 #3
Debian net install with LXDE. I also use Crux and don't find that compilations take days (though I do sometimes have to leave a system update running overnight). Jonathan's definition of old and weak hardware must be older and weaker than mine! For the record, I have a Celeron Coppermine processor (which I think is equivalent to a P3) and 256MB of RAM."I'm just a little old lady; don't try to dazzle me with jargon!"
- 12-28-2009 #4
Arch, assuming an i686 processor.
Otherwise, Tinycore or Slitaz.
Same as in other polls, I question prominently featuring Damn Small Linux, since the project appears dead. (And one of the main developers moved on to create TinyCore Linux.)
- 12-28-2009 #5
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
Voted Puppy because there a a ton of Puplets with different Kernels,Desktops,Wifi Support, etc..... Running as root user takes some getting used to for sudo users . The Puppy community is a vibrant community and I have seen Puplets like Uhuru that will run on minimal spec hardware. So this time my vote goes for Puppy.
TinyCore which I haven't dabbled with as yet looks like a good distro also. Test driving Slitaz was a joy on Pentium 2 Ibm 390E with 128mb of ram.
Edit: I just mention these because they are pretty easy for a Non Linux Computer Technical Windows only Home user that has no idea of how a computer works to run live at least though Tiny Core would be harder on them then Puppy or Slitaz.
- 12-29-2009 #6
I call old hardware a PII or lower with 128 or less MB of RAM.
A Debian net install will work quite nicely on those kinds of systems.
- 12-30-2009 #7
I do have a very old Toshiba laptop with only 8 MB of Ram (32 MB max), 500 MB HDD and no usb or CD-rom, only floppy drive.
Still looking for a distro that fits on it and gives a bit of performance. Originally it had Win 3.1. Now it is running on Win95.Charles
ASUS EEE Box B202, Atom 270 1,6GHz, 1 GB, HDD 80GB, XP-SP3 / PinguyOS
Asus EEE PC 901 with Bodhi-Linux
- 12-30-2009 #8
There are a couple of projects out there for machines with such limited hardware. I don't know how many are active though. If you can upgrade to the 32 MB max, your options slightly increase.
Feather Linux - Download
MuLinux Home Site: muLinux version 14r0
The last is command line only, but actually uses a modern kernel and had an update this year. Requires 16 MB RAM.
- 12-30-2009 #9
- 12-30-2009 #10