Results 1 to 5 of 5
I was tonight doing research for a paper on the Internet meme of domains in the form [productname]sucks, [companyname]sucks, and similar.
This URL format has become a shorthand way in ...
- 03-20-2010 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 0
ubuntu-sucks.com
I was tonight doing research for a paper on the Internet meme of domains in the form [productname]sucks, [companyname]sucks, and similar.
This URL format has become a shorthand way in which people in Net culture can know they can find a site critical of some product or company or similar.
So if I want to find views critical of Ebay, I know that it is highly likely I'll find them by merely typing ebaysucks.com - and as the link shows, it is so.
I discovered that Canonnical, Ubuntu's parent company, owns the ubuntu-sucks and ubuntusucks domains. The sites redirect to the official bug report page.
I've been an Ubuntu fan for quite a while now, but I was shocked when I discovered this. I'm wondering if others find this a troubling as I do. For an organization said to be strong advocates of free and freedom, this seems quite ugly, heavy-handed and suppressive.
To show how this [productname]sucks, [companyname]sucks format has become a very widespread shorthand way for people to find criticism of a company or product, here's a sampling of some active domains:
mac-sucks.com
microsoftsucks.org
whylinuxsucks.org
paypalsucks.com
oreilly-sucks.com
disney-sucks.com
allstateinsurancesucks.com
peta-sucks.com
lowes-sucks.com
glenn-beck-sucks.com
chase-sucks.com
- 03-20-2010 #2
It also shows a company with a sense of humour which is prepared to say
None of the others do that, and if the target company does get hold of it, the site usually gets shut down pronto.OK then smartarse, you tell us how it sucks and we will make it less sucky!If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)
My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.
- 03-20-2010 #3Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Posts
- 6,110
I don't even know where to start with this. Are you serious?
Can you explain to me- How this suppresses anything, when criticism is not limited to this domain
- How this is heavy handed, when it does not limit anything
- How you find it "troubling"
The *-sucks domains are largely either troll-sites or non-productive rants. They are a fine example of an overpowering minority where one person or a small group elevate themselves above their due platform to admonish their opinion on a product or group. If you find it easier to find out if and why such-and-such a product sucks by checking this type of domain instead of using the product, using a search engine or doing your own research then I don't think you'd be suitably qualified to make this type of decision anyway.
Nice troll, better try for something more believable next time.
- 03-20-2010 #4If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)
My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.
- 03-20-2010 #5Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 8,955
To quote the Great Monty Python, "Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, Spam, eggs, and Spam!"...
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!




