Results 1 to 5 of 5
Hello,
Platform: Arch Linux, 2.6.35 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5900 @ 2.20GHz
Browser: Chromium 6.0.472.62 (0), Mozilla Firefox 3.6.10, lynx 2.8.7rel.2
MUA: KMail 1.13.5, Gmail Web Interface
ADSL Router: ...
- 10-20-2010 #1
Ars Technica, Slashdot URLs in eNews won't open for me
Hello,
Platform: Arch Linux, 2.6.35 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T5900 @ 2.20GHz
Browser: Chromium 6.0.472.62 (0), Mozilla Firefox 3.6.10, lynx 2.8.7rel.2
MUA: KMail 1.13.5, Gmail Web Interface
ADSL Router: D-Link DSL-2500U
URLs to Ars Technica and Slashdot in eNews have been constantly broken for me recently. For example, yesterday I received this link: Slashdot Linux Story | Desktop Linux Is Dead , which gives me the "Oops!" page in Chromium, "Server not found" in Firefox and "Unable to locate remote host rss.slashdot.org." in lynx . I can open Slashdot - News for nerds, stuff that matters , however. I am behind an ADSL router with no proxies in my LAN. It has never happened to me (in recent days, too) that sites which I knew should work won't work. In other words, the whole Internet works okay, just as it had worked before the links in eNews broke.
I tried checking the link with Down for everyone or just me? , and it told me it's just me.
Does this necessarily mean that my ISP is messing with the traffic?..Last edited by unlimitedscolobb; 10-20-2010 at 07:39 PM. Reason: Remove a bogus newline.
- 10-21-2010 #2forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,081
Both links working fine here.
Don't know what your ISP might be doing, but they should have a support phone number where you can call them and ask what's up.oz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.
- 10-21-2010 #3
Yeah, I'd expect that, since Down for everyone or just me? tells me they are okay.
I'm a little bit reluctant to call them: it was critical that I did this twice in all the time, and both times I had to listen to the carrier signal for about 6 to 8 minutes... I guess I'll have to do that a third time now.
- 10-21-2010 #4
Have you tried using different DNS servers, for example
208.67.222.222 and 208.67 220.220 which are opendns.orgIf we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)
My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.
- 10-23-2010 #5
It works, thank you so much!

I have one question, though. When I had the alternative DNS servers added to the tail of /etc/resolv.conf, the pages wouldn't open anyway. However, when I put the configuration lines into the head, it started working. As far as I understand, I am now using only the opendns.org servers. My understanding of DNS before this was that if the resolution for a domain name fails on one DNS, alternatives are tried. Is this not so?Last edited by unlimitedscolobb; 10-23-2010 at 08:14 AM. Reason: Fix formatting for opendns.org .


Reply With Quote

