Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 5 of 5
This was sparked off by a thread in another forum - someone complaining that he couldn't find his menu.lst any more. Because of course he'd been "upgraded" to GRUB2. Several ...
  1. #1
    Linux Engineer hazel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Harrow, UK
    Posts
    951

    I'm sick of grubbing around! Back to LILO!

    This was sparked off by a thread in another forum - someone complaining that he couldn't find his menu.lst any more. Because of course he'd been "upgraded" to GRUB2. Several people added their complaints that GRUB2 is so insanely complicated. And I suddenly thought "What the heck am I doing with a piece of bloatware like this on my computer?".

    Most of you know how important simplicity and comprehensibility are to me. Yet I haven't the faintest idea how GRUB works, let alone GRUB2. It's easy enough to see how LILO works. And it's Crux's preferred bootloader anyway.

    So I installed it in Crux, edited up a suitable lilo.conf, ran /sbin/lilo and behold! I can boot both Crux and Debian. It's slower than GRUB2 but I'm going to try the compact option which hopefully should speed things up. You can have a menu interface like GRUB's too and I want to try that out.

    I went to the Lilo site and they've actually started development again (since 2010). Obviously they expect a lot of refugees from GRUB2. Well, they have one already!
    "I'm just a little old lady; don't try to dazzle me with jargon!"

  2. #2
    oz
    oz is offline
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    18,082
    I've used GRUB, GRUB2, and LILO plenty of times and haven't had any real problems with any of them but I usually end up running whichever bootloader is the default for the distro that I'm running just to keep things more simplified.

    Very glad to hear that LILO is being developed again!
    oz

    new members/users: read this first | new member faq
    no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
    please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.

  3. #3
    Linux Guru Lazydog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Keystone State
    Posts
    2,279
    Same here, use what ever is default on the install.

    Regards
    Robert

    Linux
    The adventure of a life time.

    Linux User #296285
    Get Counted

  4. #4
    Trusted Penguin jayd512's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    4,072
    I must say, I'm in complete agreement with peoples opinion of GRUB2.
    I had a fair grasp on GRUB, and if a little time was taken it was easy enough to see how it was doing what it was doing.
    GRUB2, however, just seems like a fubar from the planet Snafu!

    Next time I do an install, I'm likely to follow suit with hazel.
    Jay

    New users, read this first.
    New Member FAQ
    Registered Linux User #463940
    I do not respond to Private Messages asking for Linux help. Please, keep it on the public boards.

  5. #5
    Just Joined! PrinceSharma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    /Universe/Earth/India
    Posts
    81
    Well, I hated grub2 and for a reason.
    The Mint 9 box I have used for an year, was being installed grub with, removing grub2 bloat.
    I used Salix with LILO and I loved it plain and simple but I'm more familiar with grub so that will remain my choice.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •