Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Linux Mint Debian Edition is based on the testing branch of Debian, this gives a true rolling release with up to date software but on occasion an incautiously applied update ...
  1. #1
    Trusted Penguin elija's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Either at home or at work or down the pub
    Posts
    2,287

    Linux Mint Debian Edition introduces a safety net

    Linux Mint Debian Edition is based on the testing branch of Debian, this gives a true rolling release with up to date software but on occasion an incautiously applied update can break things. After all it is based on a testing distribution! It is this occasional borkage that has prevented me from recommending LMDE to complete beginners.

    Now, LMDE have introduced two new repositories, incoming and latest. Both of these mirror the Debian testing repository with incoming being raw and latest being a lot more stable and *ahem* tested. Latest gets updates every month.

    Honestly, Mint just gets better and better.

    Would you like to know more?
    If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)


    My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.

  2. #2
    Linux Guru Jonathan183's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,941
    Looks good ... but it's likely to involve a lot of work.
    I'm running LMDE using squeeze rather than testing, only thing which has broken since the install is firefox - just uninstalled and switched to iceweasel.

    Ed: I think an option to run stable repositories at install would allow novice users to use a rock solid Mint ... switching to testing as they gain more experience. This approach would involve less effort ...

  3. #3
    Trusted Penguin elija's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Either at home or at work or down the pub
    Posts
    2,287
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan183 View Post
    I think an option to run stable repositories at install would allow novice users to use a rock solid Mint ... switching to testing as they gain more experience. This approach would involve less effort ...
    That's a good idea, why not suggest it at http://community.linuxmint.com or if you don't mint, I'll nick it and suggest it
    If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)


    My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.

  4. #4
    Linux User sgosnell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Baja Oklahoma
    Posts
    358
    I switched to Unstable instead of Testing, and get a LOT less borkage. IME, Unstable is actually more stable than Testing, and the occasional borkage lasts a much shorter time. In truth, I've removed all the easily-removable Mint stuff and I'm running pretty much stock Debian Unstable. I never found any "minty goodness" and I can't abide the Mint interface, but that's a personal preference, and I know that lots of people do like it.

  5. #5
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    146
    You should notice, before Debian's 'testing' phase, 2 more phases go by. experimental and unstable, thus testing is not that updated and unstable. Till date I've not had much problems with it.

  6. #6
    Linux User sgosnell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Baja Oklahoma
    Posts
    358
    There is a long thread on the Linux Mint forums, in the LMDE subforum, about constant breakage after every update for those tracking Testing. It mostly involves NVidia drivers, but also other video drivers as well as other apps. It may be that at least some of the problems are caused by the Mint repositories, but I can't say for sure, since I quit using those long ago. I read about the problems, but have had few of them since I started using the Sid repositories.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •