Results 1 to 10 of 11
I received an offer from Newegg today for 16 GB ram (4 x 4 GB). The price was reasonable, but I couldn't help thinking that 16 GB would be way ...
- 07-21-2011 #1
Is 16 GB ram overkill?
I received an offer from Newegg today for 16 GB ram (4 x 4 GB). The price was reasonable, but I couldn't help thinking that 16 GB would be way more than I would likely need. This brings up the question, who would need 16 GB ram, and what is the optimal amount for most users?
Registered Linux user #526930
- 07-21-2011 #2
Depends on the usecase.
My workstation has 8gb. Which is ok as I run 2-3 VMs on it concurrently.
For a DB developer trying things on his workstation, 16gb is also nice.
Server usage? Yes please. Can I have some more?
A desktop for web browsing and mail? 16gb are overkill
my 2cYou must always face the curtain with a bow.
- 07-21-2011 #3forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,082
oz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.
- 07-21-2011 #4
Well, I'm running 16GB of ram and the good thing about it is there is a lot to play with. For example, I have a 512MB /tmp mounted from my RAM which gives a real speed boost. You can also run multiple and quite chunky VMs with memory left over.
But ultimately, I'm running 16GB because I can ^_^If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)
My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.
- 07-21-2011 #5forum.guy
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- arch linux
- Posts
- 18,082
oz
→ new members/users: read this first | new member faq
→ no private messages requesting computer support - post them on the forums!
→ please use the "report post" button to alert our forum admins to problematic posts rather than responding to them yourself.
- 07-22-2011 #6Linux user #126863 - see http://linuxcounter.net/
- 07-23-2011 #7Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 8,956
I have 8GB on my workstation, but if I was to enable more servers I would increase it to 16GB most likely. Better more than you need than less...
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!
- 07-25-2011 #8
So the answer seems to be that servers need more, work stations that run multiple VM's need more, and home users may not have to have that much memory, but it can't hurt. Is that about right?
Registered Linux user #526930
- 07-25-2011 #9Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 8,956
As someone once said, there are times when more is better...

You need to determine what your normal maximum memory requirements are, and then make sure that you have adequate RAM to support that. Once you hit the swapper, performance will take a significant dive; however, if this is a rare situation, then you might be able to tolerate it when it happens.Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!
- 07-25-2011 #10
With the 4 GB I have now, I never see any lag that appears ram related. Occaisionally I have wireless issues, but that is the network not my ram. The cropping of snapshots seems fast, my system goes from off to ready to use in 41 seconds, and the sudoku, majong, and foobilliards I play all seem snappy. I keep multiple browsing windows open, and when I am working on documents often have 2,3, or more search windows open, all of which seem to be plenty fast. All that is why I wondered what I would need 16 GB for, especially as a home user. Thanks to all who enlightened me.
Registered Linux user #526930


Reply With Quote

