Results 1 to 10 of 12
Honestly it makes me really mad they're doing this, totally ignore all us 32 bit users who computers work just fine, but at the same time totally understand it
I ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 01-06-2013 #1Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 57
What do you think of Chakra Linux giving up 32 bit?
Honestly it makes me really mad they're doing this, totally ignore all us 32 bit users who computers work just fine, but at the same time totally understand it

I know another distro that does this, Iqunix. Soon all might do this
- 01-07-2013 #2Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 10,143
Is it giving up 32-bit, or just adding 64-bit capabilities? In truth, all 64-bit Linux distributions can run 32-bit applications. This issue is more a hardware one than anything else. Almost all current Intel-compatible processors are capable of 64-bit operation, so dropping 32-bit support mostly means that you will either have to build a 32-bit version manually if you have old hardware, or stay with the older version.
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!
- 01-07-2013 #3
I think when a distro decides to do this they should come out with one last long term build for it. I can see why they do it and I am sure more will do it down the road.
- 01-07-2013 #4
I prefer distros that support 32 bit, I'd just move on ... there are still plenty of distros which support 32 bit. Having said that I'm not really their target audience
- 01-07-2013 #5Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 10,143
I have a number of older 32-bit systems and run Linux on them. I'd prefer to use a newer version that supports older (386 and 486) hardware. My work-a-day systems all are newer hardware, fully supporting 64-bit code, but I have some software on the older systems that won't port so easily.
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!
- 01-08-2013 #6
32 bit users haven't got long and as for the 386, well...
If we hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards. Checkmate! (Zapp Brannigan)
My new blog. It's probably not as good as I think it is.
The Fifth Continent reborn
- 01-08-2013 #7Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Location
- Scotland UK
- Posts
- 7
Alternative to Chakra 32 bit
Lubuntu 12.04 LTS (supported until April 2017) 32 bit ,will be fine if your processor /hardware is not 64 bit.
I happily run Lubuntu 10.04 on a desktop (AMD Athlon processor 32bit; 1GB RAM) Desktop is from AD1998 ,motherboard upgraded in AD2002
Also run Lubuntu 12.04 on an old laptop (AD2003)with P4-2.4GHz CPU and 512MB RAM
- 01-08-2013 #8Linux Guru
- Join Date
- Apr 2009
- Location
- I can be found either 40 miles west of Chicago, or in a galaxy far, far away.
- Posts
- 10,143
Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real time.
Just remember, Semper Gumbi - always be flexible!
- 01-10-2013 #9Code:
$ uname -r 3.6.2-antix.1-486-smp
Nicely said Jonathan183. Still Dumpster diving/fishing for a computer with With Windows 7 on it .there are still plenty of distros which support 32 bit
Linux Registered User # 475019
Lead,Follow, or get the heck out of the way
AntiX,Puppy,Windows 7=(cuz of scooters)
Free Linux Books
Free R Books
- 01-11-2013 #10
My desktop PC would be about 35 years old by then ... and I should have been retired for about 5 years or so ... depending on how high the government has managed to ratchet up the retirement age by then

distrowatch still lists 100+ distros with 386 support so you still have options ...
... give it a year or two
Last edited by Jonathan183; 01-11-2013 at 10:00 PM.


1Likes
Reply With Quote

