Results 1 to 9 of 9
Hey, I switched to using Fedora full time for the first time in years and used Linux exclusively. Well, a few months later the time came where I needed Windows ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 01-31-2013 #1
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
Verdict: Windows is boring!
- 01-31-2013 #2
Do I detect a certain amount of sarcasm? Yes, Windows is boring, but not because it "just works". Windows is boring even when it doesn't work (which is quite often) because the fix is either a registry hack, which you have to follow blindly without knowing what you're doing, or "Just reinstall." Either way, you never learn anything.
Linux "just works" a lot of the time. I've never had any problems with dependencies because most package managers install them automatically. But there's always something new to learn about how the software actually works because it's all so well documented.
I wouldn't like to go back to Windows for any money!"I'm just a little old lady; don't try to dazzle me with jargon!"
- 01-31-2013 #3
I made the full switch about 9 months ago and would never go back. I have to use Windows half of the time at work and Unix the other half. I have been trying to get my parents to use Linux so I don't have to "fix" their computers all the time. They love to get viruses, they read and open every email even if they have no clue who its from. If they weren't in their 60's I might be able to convince them. It took like a year to teach my mom how to email and browse the web. I could only imagine how long it would take to teach them a new OS.
There is only one thing I can't do on Linux that I could do on Windows. (There is a way I just have not sat down and learned how yet.)
- 01-31-2013 #4
Windows? Boring? Purleez!
Consider installing software...
On Linux use repository.
On Windows. Find software on random Internet site. Download it and remember where. Extract and run installer, hoping that it doesn't contain a nasty that my virus scanner and malware scanner misses. Or that my virus scanner hasn't already been disabled by a previous nasty. Assuming a successful installation, I have to hope that the software isn't quietly sending my bank account details to the author (which to be fair seems to rarely happen) as I usually can't check the source code to make sure it doen't.
Adrenaline rush right there!What do we want?
When do we want 'em?
Doesn't really matter does it!?
Conkybots: Interactive plugins for your Conkys!
- 01-31-2013 #5
- Join Date
- May 2004
- arch linux
- 01-31-2013 #6
Durn. I'm not bored. I can't even get Windows 6,7.or 8 to boot up and install and run half decent on this
sh-4.1# inxi -Fxz System: Host: biker Kernel: 184.108.40.206 i686 (32 bit, gcc: 4.4.3) Desktop: JWM sn-493 Distro: unknown Machine: System: IBM (portable) product: 26474MU Mobo: IBM model: 26474MU Bios: IBM version: 1AET64WW (1.20 ) date: 10/18/2006 CPU: Single core Mobile Intel Pentium III CPU - M (-UP-) cache: 512 KB flags: (pae sse) bmips: 2397.66 clocked at 1198.834 MHz Graphics: Card: S3 SuperSavage IX/C SDR bus-ID: 01:00.0 X.org: 1.7.6 drivers: savage (unloaded: vesa) tty size: 80x24 Advanced Data: N/A for root Audio: Card: Intel 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Audio Controller driver: Intel ICH ports: 1c00 18c0 bus-ID: 00:1f.5 Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture ver: 1.0.21 Network: Card-1: Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) PRO/100 VE (LOM) Ethernet Controller driver: e100 ver: 3.5.24-k2-NAPI port: 6400 bus-ID: 02:08.0 IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter> Card-2: RaLink RT2561/RT61 802.11g PCI driver: rt61pci ver: 2.3.0 bus-ID: 07:00.0 IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter> Drives: HDD Total Size: 80.0GB (-) 1: id: /dev/sda model: ST980815A size: 80.0GB Partition: ID: / size: 14G used: 2.6G (20%) fs: ext3 ID: swap-1 size: 1.04GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap RAID: No RAID devices detected - /proc/mdstat and md_mod kernel raid module present Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 48.0C mobo: 44.0C Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A fan-1: 0 Info: Processes: 89 Uptime: 1:33 Memory: 263.9/1010.2MB Runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 4.4.3 Client: Shell (sh) inxi: 1.8.34 sh-4.1#
- 02-01-2013 #7
The fact that I personally don't like MicroSoft doesn't make me think anything bad about it. I don't think it's boring. I like Windows XP and I have no problem sitting down to a Win7 machine.
If you're careful about what you're doing, then Windows will 'just work'. Without any major problems at all.
But the same stands true for Linux. Care has to be taken.
My main gripe is this... And I've said it before.
It's easier for an experienced Windows user to bork a system than it is for a total Linux Noob.
- 02-06-2013 #8
- Join Date
- May 2004
- arch linux
For me, Win2K and WinXP were perhaps the best releases that Microsoft has ever had. In fact, I only stopped using Win2K at work when it would no longer accept the graphics cards that I installed in a few computers. Two of those machines now run WinXP while two others run Win7. I'd probably still be running Win2K in all of them if it would work with the current hardware. I never did get around to trying Vista, and most likely will never try Win8. In fact, I'm seriously considering installing Linux on all work computers even though it has been suggested that Windows is a requirement.
Regarding boredom, I won't say that I've never been bored while on the job, but any experienced didn't seem to be stemming from the use of Windows.oz
- 02-07-2013 #9
I did not find the BSOD or registry tweaking (both W2k) boring -- just a tedious form of job security until the burn-out.
Au contraire, ˇWindows es canalla!