View Poll Results: Have you ever overclocked a processor?
- Voters
- 31. You may not vote on this poll
Results 1 to 10 of 12
Hey I wanted to know if anyone here has ever overclocked a processor and which processors you may think are the best for doing it. I overclocked a pentium at ...
- 04-30-2005 #1
Overclock
Hey I wanted to know if anyone here has ever overclocked a processor and which processors you may think are the best for doing it. I overclocked a pentium at 166 mhz to 200 mhz by accident not to long ago so I learned that way.
- 04-30-2005 #2Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Where my hat is
- Posts
- 765
If I need to use a certain video application, I'll crank my 450 up to around 540. Since I don't have any additional cooling fans or anything, I don't make a habit of it.
Registered Linux user #384279
Vector Linux SOHO 6 / Vector Linux 7 RC 3.4
- 04-30-2005 #3Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Belgium
- Posts
- 1,429
My Athlon Xp 2500+ went from 1,83 Ghz stock to 2,4 Ghz
. Before, I had a 2200+, 1,8 Ghz stock, but at 2 Ghz it even didn't want to boot (with 2V on it
).
Because of mem problems (more performance if it runs synchronized with the FSB) i'm having it on 2,2 now... Is also a lot cooler, and quieter
** Registered Linux User # 393717 and proud of it
** Check out www.zenwalk.org
** Zenwalk 2.8 - Xfce 4.4 beta 2- 2.6.17.6 kernel = Slack on steroids! **
- 04-30-2005 #4Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- NJ, USA
- Posts
- 104
UNDERCLOCK
I am going to underclock a Athlon 64 to 2.2 Ghz from 2.4 Ghz. Will run much cooler. It also won't burn itself out. I think you can set the speed in the bios if you have a mobo that will support it.
My New years Resolution is 1280x1024
- 05-01-2005 #5Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- san diego, ca
- Posts
- 131
my cpu is constantly running 700mhz oced with no ill effects thus far. my video card is also oced (though i set it to defaults when not gaming or doing something gpu-intensive)
- 05-01-2005 #6
Yes, I have overclocked processors before. But at this moment I do not wish to instigate system instability for a few Mhx gain. My first overclock was getting a P2 266 to run stable at 400 (FSB overclock) It ran win 98 fine, but i couldn't get it to boot Red Hat 7 (i think hard drive was screwed).
However, my biggest overclock was the legendary Celeron 300 D @ 650 Mhz. It wouldn't boot windows without a voltage increase, so i dialled it back to 600 Mhz.
I still have the P2 running as a server now, but the celeron gave up a few years ago and died.
- 05-01-2005 #7Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 2
Hi all.
I usually beat my comp with a stick, and make it run at 850MHz - It's a 533MHz Celeron Coppermine. This i did by raising the FSB from 66 to 100MHz, with no extra voltage and a seriously bigger cooler =P
It runs farely stable (except when compiling the kernel =/)
/GbyTe
- 05-01-2005 #8Linux User
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Serbia&Montenegro
- Posts
- 281
No, but that's what I'm trying to do now. I have a Celeron 2Ghz processor.
Linux registered user #358842
Human knowledge belongs to the world.
- 05-01-2005 #9Linux User
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Florida
- Posts
- 414
Personally I have never been interested in overclocking.
registered linux user: 387197
- 05-02-2005 #10Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 826
Nope, it's not really worth it to me. I used to overclock an AMD XP 2200+ to about 1.9GHz (from 1.
when I was a Windows user back in the day. Just made everything unstable as hell (maybe it was Windows that was doing that, not the overclocking...)
But there's not a whole lot to gain unless you're in a race....


Reply With Quote
