Find the answer to your Linux question:

View Poll Results: Who do you think makes the best boards?

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • Abit

    2 8.00%
  • Albatron

    0 0%
  • Asus

    13 52.00%
  • DFI

    1 4.00%
  • Epox

    0 0%
  • Msi

    3 12.00%
  • Tyan

    0 0%
  • Other(please mention)

    6 24.00%
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
I apologize to the people who posted in my other thread. But I also thank you. Because of you're help I can avoid some rather bad manufacturers. But since we ...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
  1. #1
    Banned Richard_The_Lionhearted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Here, where else?
    Posts
    379

    Best mainboard manufacturers


    I apologize to the people who posted in my other thread. But I also thank you. Because of you're help I can avoid some rather bad manufacturers. But since we brought up which to avoid let's bring up which not to. I guess IMO the best would have to be Asus. But that differs from board to board. I've only used the TX97-E and it's still working. Feel free to also mention which boards have made that manufacturer in you're opinion the best. Thanks

  2. #2
    Linux Guru techieMoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,496
    My best experience so far as been with ASUS boards. They're the only ones that everything worked on out of the box in Linux for me (on my AMD64 system that is). A close second would be Gigabyte (only 32-bit boards, but a good experience), followed by MSI (a few little annoyances in 64-bit boards).
    Registered Linux user #270181
    TechieMoe's Tech Rants

  3. #3
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    45
    I've used Asus, Biostar, and Abit boards and I think Abit is the best.

  4. #4
    Linux User benjamin20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    jacksonville beach FL
    Posts
    317
    i think you are missing gigabyte, foxcon and asrock. those were others i thout we could aree had reliability. asus is nice but expensive for something that you could get a little cheaper. and what exactly are you trying to build here. tyan is only for servers. if you want a low cost system then gigabyte, asus and msi will give you a hard time for a low price where as foxconn, albatron, asrock, and epox.

    its not uncommon to have a motherboard last a long time reliably. after all, thats what they are desighntd to do. its those few who cut corners at every chance thqat you want to avoid. again. any teir one company is a hih chance of reliability and power. teir two is still a high chance of reliability but often no overclocking or extensive features. teir three is for dells.
    nVidia G-Force 6600GT (bfg) pci-e: amd 64 2000+ (939): 1024 corsair ram: 2X 80gb seagate harddisk SATA: plextor cd/dvd-read/write cdrom SATA

  5. #5
    oz
    oz is offline
    forum.guy
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    arch linux
    Posts
    18,733
    ASUS... nothing more need be said!

  6. #6
    Linux Guru anomie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,692
    Voted Asus, but I have little basis for comparison as I have not had much reason to switch. They have always been good to me. If I am opening my wallet I am not going to mess around.

    I have worked on emachines mobos for friends, and they were horrendously bad.

  7. #7
    Linux User GNU_man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Canada, eh
    Posts
    284
    Other: Gigabyte

    I like the dual-BIOS feature that comes standard on all models. Also better quality/price ratio than ASUS, but just as overclockable/reliable.
    PTL x10 Hallelujah!
    AMD Athlon XP 2600+ 512MB RAM Dual 80G WD HD 8MB Cache (1 WinXP Home, 1 CentOS 4.2) GeForce Ti4200 128MB SB Live! 5.1
    Registered Linux user #391521

  8. #8
    Linux Engineer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    1,429
    My first (and only) Abit died on me, afterwards I only bought Asus mainboards, and a few usb-port problems apart on my current A7N8X-E Deluxe, I'm pretty happy with it... But I don't think I will buy an Abit next time (took it for the overclocking options, but with a Via chipset... newbie back then )
    ** Registered Linux User # 393717 and proud of it ** Check out www.zenwalk.org
    ** Zenwalk 2.8 - Xfce 4.4 beta 2- 2.6.17.6 kernel = Slack on steroids! **

  9. #9
    Linux User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    352
    I would personally have to say ASUS. I've owned about 3 boards from ASUS and have never had any trouble with either. Very reliable and stable, and they're great overclocking boards, which I can't find the time to mess around with anymore...

  10. #10
    Linux Guru AlexK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,379
    ASUS all the way, no other manufacturer can match their quality and reliability. But they can be far dearer than competitiors, and for me this is their only drawback.
    Life is complex, it has a real part and an imaginary part.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •