Results 11 to 20 of 31
Well I figure if I can convince M.I.T. to use Jedi on their servers, then when I apply, I'll just say:
"You know your servers? Yeah, I wrote that."...
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
- 06-22-2005 #11
Well I figure if I can convince M.I.T. to use Jedi on their servers, then when I apply, I'll just say:
"You know your servers? Yeah, I wrote that."
- 06-22-2005 #12Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- At a rock house in Oak Cliff...
- Posts
- 87
Re: Usefulness of Linux?
Linux is a unique type of Unix. It is built upon the same fundamentals. Thus making it a TYPE of the UNIX operating system. Whether or not you call it a clone or a type, it is the same idea. By saying "Linux != Unix" is simply absurd in meaning. I am of course quoting Bjarne Stroustrup from a conference he made. But what would he know, right? He only knew Ritchie...
Originally Posted by dylunio
- 06-22-2005 #13
Linux is a Unix-like OS, let's leave it at that (/me smells another OpenBSD Thread)
- 06-22-2005 #14Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- At a rock house in Oak Cliff...
- Posts
- 87
PM if you wish to give an uncut/unedited take on me...
- 06-22-2005 #15
That wasn't an attack against you by the way, that was me pre-emptively defusing the situation
- 06-22-2005 #16
Re: Usefulness of Linux?
This isn't a matter of opinion. You simply have your facts confused. Linux is NOT Unix, see my previous post for that. Unix is a trademark for a set of operating systems that have paid a fee to The Open Group, who bought that trademark from Novell, who acquired it from AT&T.
Originally Posted by ibowtotux
Linus Torvalds created a kernel that was designed to act like a UNIX kernel, but that is where the comparison ends. Linux is a completely free, non-proprietary kernel that has no ties to UNIX other than the way it works.
BSD on the other hand at one time did contain UNIX code from AT&T (see history of BSD here), so you could technically say that in the past, BSD was UNIX. Now however all vestiges of the AT&T code to the best of my knowledge have been removed, but it still remains much closer to UNIX than Linux.
I hope that clears up any confusion and we can move on.
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 06-22-2005 #17
However, to be painstakingly accurate, Linus borrowed a lot of ideas from Tannenbaum (and Minix was UNIX).
Some similarities between UNIX and Linux would be:
-Same basic filesystem layout (where everything is a subset of / )
-A lot of the same commands
-GNU/Linux metadistributions generally either use BSD Initscripts or System V Init, inherited from BSD and System V, respectively.
-And the list goes on...
However Linux is not Unix, however it is a UNIX-like environment.
- 06-22-2005 #18
i went to a tech school (tennessee technology center) and they didn't care if you even knew how to turn on a computer. pointless school, dont recommend to anyone. now i am going to a real college, and they still dont care. as someone said in an earlier post, its all about money. no prior experience was necessary.
Today I fell and felt better, Just knowing this matters, I just feel stronger and SHARPER!!!, Found a box of sharp objects, What a beautiful THING!!! Box of Sharp Objects - The Used
- 06-22-2005 #19No, to be painstakingly accurate, Minix was a clone of UNIX, to the best of my knowledge contained no proprietary code, and was never registered under the name of UNIX, therefore Minix is also not Unix. (source)
Originally Posted by lakerdonald
PS - Guys, I'm not trying to be difficult here, I'm just trying to clarify what I saw as a misinterpretation of publicly-available factual information. I know it might be silly (and off-topic) to argue this point, so I'm just going to stop here.
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 06-22-2005 #20I will also stop here by saying this:
Originally Posted by techieMoe
As far as I knew, Minix was in fact a Unix Microkernel optimized for the PC...then again I could be wrong.


Reply With Quote
