Results 1 to 10 of 236
Well MS has finally given a release name to 'Longhorn', Windows VISTA.
I would like to see how much effort they have put into the OS or if they have ...
- 07-22-2005 #1Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 131
Windows VISTA
Well MS has finally given a release name to 'Longhorn', Windows VISTA.
I would like to see how much effort they have put into the OS or if they have just copied ideas from os X and Linux
Does anyone have any decent sites where some recent pics have been taken of Vista (Longhorn)
MS site
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/default.mspxVery funny scotty - now beam down my clothes
- 07-22-2005 #2
Re: Windows VISTA
Aye, our friend Dolda has some shots. Find them here.
Originally Posted by GrumpyGerbil I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
- 07-22-2005 #3Linux User
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 473
i acualy luv the transparicy, it acualy looks nice, but they over-did it, if i get im sticking wit BBlight
- 07-22-2005 #4
- 07-22-2005 #5Linux Newbie
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- massachusetts, north america
- Posts
- 105
OoOoOo, pretty colours, it's still going to suck
it'll probably end up making you do this
Signature removed by moderator - please see forum rules or else.
- 07-22-2005 #6Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Belgium
- Posts
- 1,429
This only reminds me of TechieMoe's post about Linuxforums.org becoming a slashdot mirror...
** Registered Linux User # 393717 and proud of it
** Check out www.zenwalk.org
** Zenwalk 2.8 - Xfce 4.4 beta 2- 2.6.17.6 kernel = Slack on steroids! **
- 07-22-2005 #7*sighs*
Originally Posted by borromini Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 07-22-2005 #8
wow, what a useless page... they say NOTHING about it... WE MUST GET IT NOW!!! or not...
Here's why Linux is easier than Windows:
Package Managers! Apt-Get and Portage (among others) allow users to install programs MUCH easier than Windows can.
Hardware Drivers. In SuSE, ALL the hardware is detected and installed automatically! How is this harder than Windows' constant disc changing and rebooting?
- 07-22-2005 #9Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Inside the Kernel (somewhere)
- Posts
- 41
I got my hands on one of the early betas , and was most definitely not impressed.
The "hardware detection" is incredibly long. They say 10 minutes, but it took at least a half hour for my hardware to be detected. By no means am I running a "slow" pc, I've got an AMD 3200XP CPU w/ 1.5g 400 ddr in here, which handles everything at a nice, even pace from what I've seen.
The beta I installed (admittedly, it was the 4000 beta, not the newer) completely crippled numerous applications, such as my email application (Barca), and was slower than anything to run.
We'll see how it turns out, but I have a feeling that this is going to be a rather resource intensive OS.
- 07-22-2005 #10Which makes me wonder how well it will run resource-intensive applications.
Originally Posted by twhiting9275
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants



