Proof Reading Not Required

[CopperTop]

Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in
waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist
and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you
can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey
lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.

:P

[big_k105]

thats pretty cool cause i was able to read it all perfectly. and i cant even do that when the words are right LOL

[QuickDraw]

yea ... oddly enough i read it just fine too without having to go back and reread anything. weird. reminds me of something i learned in a psychology class.



------------ ---------------
|////////// ///////////////|
|////////// ///////////////|
|////////// ///////////////|
|////////// ///////////////|

|////////// ///////////////|
|////////// ///////////////|
|////////// ///////////////|
|////////// ///////////////|
----------- ---------------

if you show someone a picture like that, they will assume they are looking at a square, only because it closely resembles one, but technically is not a square. you can do the same thing with circles, triangles, anything really. i forget what the term was called though. been too long.

(it's easier to show on a piece of paper)

[sarumont]

The reading is a bit slower, but if you get used to reading letters in a certain order to mean something, it takes a little pause to get what they mean out of order. But reading stuff like that all the time, I would get used to it. And wouldn't have to backspace so much.

[flw]

Looking for patterns when none is obvious is second nature to the brain which is why most people can read my posts

It's also how the brain see's a pic in ascii art as well as other abstract forms like pixels from your monitor. It is just a bunch of dots right?