Find the answer to your Linux question:
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Yep, I remember the time when I first installed BeOS as an 500MB image under windows. Once I felt myself comfortable with this OS I installed it on separate partition ...
  1. #1
    Linux Newbie RustamB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Baku, Azerbaijan
    Posts
    214

    I miss BeOS

    Yep, I remember the time when I first installed BeOS as an 500MB image under windows. Once I felt myself comfortable with this OS I installed it on separate partition (befs formatted ), and migrated my daily tasks on it.

    I liked BeOS cause it had well written and nice documented API, graphics were implemented the other way than X in linux resulting in fast graphics and multimedia, package manager, friendly installer, various config tools, dozens of usefull applications (compilers, dev tools, players, editors, chat, email, games, etc...) all these in combination with very sexy look and feel and yetit was very resource saving.

    Though there where not so many drivers for that OS those days and it used to crash sometimes, but community was growing around BeOS, and I believed that one day BeOS will be very strong alternative for other OS's. BeBits.org then was the resource that I checked daily for new goodies

    One day when I launched browser and navigated to www.be.com I read the news that Palm bought BeOS team with all staff for 12M$, and there is no "Be incorporated" anymore and be.com domain is for sale Palm did not just buy the project in order to continue it under Palm management, they closed the project and hired BeOS developers team. Another ass hole company yellowTab continued to develop BeOS under new name ZETA, product is only commercially available and it's not so cheap I have to say. Without community it's almost dead. I used to check their website and did not see any great news since the time they first decided to continue commercial version of BeOS.

    Why did I write this post? I'm just sorry that such a cool project like BeOS that I liked was suddenly closed, even these days I used to colorize KDE in BeOS color scheme. Rest in peace, BeOS... Please, share your comments, those who ever used BeOS in their daily work are greatly appreciated

  2. #2
    Linux Guru techieMoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,496
    You're not the only one to have that sentiment. I never used BeOS, but there is quite a cult following for it thanks to the internet. A few companies have tried releasing newer versions of the last free BeOS release, and others have tried coding a new OS that works like it. I don't know how much success any of them have had, but one project that's working on it is Haiku.
    Registered Linux user #270181
    TechieMoe's Tech Rants

  3. #3
    Linux Newbie RustamB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Baku, Azerbaijan
    Posts
    214
    Yes, there is an OpenBeOS project at sourceforge, I checked it out, but it's not so popular these days, and is not growing the way BeOS did before, when Be incorporated existed.

    Another thing that comes to mind is distro size. BeOS installer was only 45MB exe!!! All goods listed above in 45MB installer! Though disk space is not critical these days, but such economic space utilization in comparison with what this OS could give to end user and developer is impressing.

  4. #4
    Linux Newbie ThoughtVelocity's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    160
    Stay tuned Haiku will be on it's way Not soon enough though.

    http://www.haiku-os.org/learn.php

    I had a discussion around here a while back about BeOS. There are not many OSes that have/had the "magic" it did. *sigh*
    "If you are out to describe the truth leave elegance to the tailor."
    -Einstein

  5. #5
    Linux Engineer
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Ft. Polk, LA
    Posts
    796
    I tried BeOS at one time. When I installed it, it didn't have any partition tool, so I had to boot Linux and use fdisk. There were very few install options. The bootloader wasn't so special either. Once it was installed, it worked pretty good, but I couldn't use it much because it's screen was a couple inches offset from the monitor so that the bottom and left sides were not visible. Couldn't find a way to fix that either. But all that aside, the little I did use it, it did seem kinda quick (quicker than Windows, but not any moreso than Linux the way I got it all set up) and it could have been a nice, polished OS. That was before Be Inc went away when I tried it. Haven't really cared enough to try out one of these new Be like OSes, but maybe one day I will.

  6. #6
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    114
    There is a new free ZETA 1.1 LiveCD on Yellow Tab website:

    http://www.yellowtab.com

    http://download.freenet.de/archiv_z/...e-cd_7560.html

    What is the comparison between Linux and ZETA 1.1 LiveCD?

  7. #7
    Linux Engineer
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    1,366
    I do also, I tried it when it first came out way back when I was in undergrad, I was always quite impressed with it, as for the fastest...naw...that goes to minuet, it fits entirely on a floppy disk and boots superfast
    Operating System: GNU Emacs

  8. #8
    Linux Engineer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Chicago (USA)
    Posts
    1,028
    Didn't really get into computers when BeOS was around. But I'm confused about these things in the FAQ:

    Is Haiku based on Unix? Is it a Unix-like operating system?
    Haiku is not based on Unix in any way. There are many design principles that are the same, as there are between any modern operating systems. Adding to the confusion, Haiku is POSIX compliant, so many Unix and Unix-Like programs can be easily recompiled and run for Haiku.
    How can it not be Unix-like and be POSIX compliant?

    Will Haiku be multi-user?
    R1 will very likely be single-user, just as BeOS R5. As for Release 2 and beyond... we shall see. The Glass Elevator project is dealing with the possible strategies and ramifications of going to a multi-user system.
    Doesn't POSIX have something about being multi-user?

  9. #9
    Trusted Penguin Dapper Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Sovereign State of South Carolina
    Posts
    4,562
    Quote Originally Posted by xxqq
    There is a new free ZETA 1.1 LiveCD on Yellow Tab website:

    http://www.yellowtab.com

    http://download.freenet.de/archiv_z/...e-cd_7560.html

    What is the comparison between Linux and ZETA 1.1 LiveCD?
    Downloading it now! This is gonna be fun...
    Linux Mint + IceWM Registered:#371367 New Members: click here

  10. #10
    Linux User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    369
    Quote Originally Posted by a thing
    Didn't really get into computers when BeOS was around. But I'm confused about these things in the FAQ:

    Is Haiku based on Unix? Is it a Unix-like operating system?
    Haiku is not based on Unix in any way. There are many design principles that are the same, as there are between any modern operating systems. Adding to the confusion, Haiku is POSIX compliant, so many Unix and Unix-Like programs can be easily recompiled and run for Haiku.
    How can it not be Unix-like and be POSIX compliant?
    posix is just a api
    All i want for christmas is a new liver....a second chance to get afflicted with Cirrhosis

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •