Results 1 to 10 of 101
Thread: anarchy debate...
|
Enjoy an ad free experience by logging in. Not a member yet? Register.
|
|
-
09-02-2005 #1
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- massachusetts, north america
- Posts
- 105
Signature removed by moderator - please see forum rules or else.
-
09-02-2005 #2
Originally Posted by neanderthal // anarchism
btw two of the definitions of anarchy
Absence of any cohesive principle, such as a common standard or purpose.
or
Political disorder and confusion.
-
09-02-2005 #3
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- massachusetts, north america
- Posts
- 105
Originally Posted by carlosponti
aslong as theirs any talk about world issues/politics i'll be throwing in my two-cents. thank you very much. no government = people could govern theirselfs...why would you steal from your own community if everyone was treated as an equal and you already had all that you needed?
the media portraits any sort of libertarian socialist to be some maniac throwing bombs and lighting cars on fire or some sort of punk rocker guy pissing on your front lawn.
Main Entry: an·ar·chism
Pronunciation: 'a-n&r-"ki-z&m, -"när-
Function: noun
a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups
political disorder and confusion?....i think that's called just not knowing what you're talking about and blowing things up...hmm...reminds me of george w. bush.,,,,Signature removed by moderator - please see forum rules or else.
-
09-02-2005 #4
Originally Posted by neanderthal // anarchism
Not to mention that the "everyone is equal, all have what they need" is more a Marxist Communist idea than an anarchist one, but I may just be talking out of my behind there.Registered Linux user #270181
-
09-02-2005 #5
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- massachusetts, north america
- Posts
- 105
Originally Posted by techieMoe
Signature removed by moderator - please see forum rules or else.
-
09-02-2005 #6
Originally Posted by neanderthal // anarchism
-
09-02-2005 #7
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- massachusetts, north america
- Posts
- 105
Originally Posted by carlosponti
um, no. anarchy isn't chaos and disorder, but go read my thread
http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/top...olitical+views
i'm trying to prove a point here, if there were no class divisions or any of that and people could work together and treat everyone as equals then there wouldn't be such problems and if someone commits a crime then they can be kicked out and left to starve and die.Signature removed by moderator - please see forum rules or else.
-
09-02-2005 #8
Originally Posted by neanderthal // anarchism
If people could work together there would be no war, no crime, and no need for government, sure. The problem is, people can't.Registered Linux user #270181
-
09-02-2005 #9i'm trying to prove a point here, if there were no class divisions or any of that and people could work together and treat everyone as equals then there wouldn't be such problems and if someone commits a crime then they can be kicked out and left to starve and die.Dell Precision T7400 Workstation
Dual 3.33Ghz Xeon "Harpertown" Core
16GB PC5300 DDR2 ECC CL5
BFG GeForce GTX 285 OC 2GB
X-Fi Platinum
HP w2408 24" Monitor
Dual Boot:openSUSE 11.2/Win 7 Ultimate
-
09-02-2005 #10
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- massachusetts, north america
- Posts
- 105
Originally Posted by LondoJowo
by then people won't be able to understand "peace"Signature removed by moderator - please see forum rules or else.