Results 11 to 16 of 16
Please note that Slax and Slack(ware) aren't the same! Slax is a live cd based on Slack and is nowhere near as old.
The Slackware site contains a post to ...
- 10-13-2005 #11Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Ft. Polk, LA
- Posts
- 796
Please note that Slax and Slack(ware) aren't the same! Slax is a live cd based on Slack and is nowhere near as old.
The Slackware site contains a post to comp.os.linux announcing 1.0 by it's founder Patrick Volkerding on July 16, 1993 which says
Debian's web site saysThe Slackware Linux distribution (v. 1.00) is now available ... This release is based largely on the SLS system, but has been enhanced and modified substantially.
This would seem to make Slackware a month older than Debian. Though this is based on Slack's first release and the beginning of Debian, which did not have a release until June 17, 1996 according to Wikipedia.Debian was begun in August 1993 by Ian Murdock, as a new distribution which would be made openly, in the spirit of Linux and GNU.
According to Wikipedia's page on SLS Linux,
SLS was probably the first distro which might be considered comparable to today's distros, though Wikipedia's page on Linux distrobutions says that MCC Interim Linux was released in February of 1992, which would make it older than SLS.Softlanding Linux System (SLS) was an early Linux distribution, founded by Peter MacDonald in mid-1992. It was the first to offer a comprehensive Linux distribution containing more than the Linux Kernel and basic utilities, plus early GNU/Linux features such as the X Window System and TCP/IP.
Now, according to the README for MCC,
andWhen Linux version 0.10 first appeared in the autumn of 1991, it was released by Linus Torvalds as a pair of floppy disks, known as the "boot" and "root" disks. Linus himself released several utilities which did not fit on these disks. Eventually quite a number of contributions were available. Software distribution was rather chaotic, and you needed a lot of effort to collect a complete base system.
So perhaps Linus himself created the first "distro", and it's possible that MCC was second, followed by others like TAMU, SLS, and one created by one known as H.J. Lu (who also maintains a very common binutils package as an alternative to GNU's). Some intricate googling may or may not dig up any more info, I looked into this awhile ago and could't find much more than this.Very shortly after the first MCC Interim version of Linux appeared, other people released similar versions
- 10-13-2005 #12Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 83
First release, was 1993. If your statement was correct, it would make Debian the oldest surviving distro (beta or not beta), contradicting what slack fans have said for years. I am fully able to read. Please do not attempt to offend me just because I proved your statement wrong.
Originally Posted by a12ctic
- 10-13-2005 #13Linux User
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 473
:drown: sorry wrong info
Originally Posted by the0r3tic
- 10-13-2005 #14Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 83
I think Debian is a great distro though, it's my favourite between it and slackware.
Originally Posted by a12ctic
- 10-13-2005 #15Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Chicago (USA)
- Posts
- 1,028
RedHat started in 1995.
Originally Posted by a12ctic
- 10-13-2005 #16Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 83
Yeah, because their website went up in 96' so I thought it might of been that time.
Originally Posted by a thing


Reply With Quote
