Results 1 to 4 of 4
http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/05-steven-xtech/
Looks like it will be good... too bad it probably wont be in wide use until 2020 and there will be XHTML10 by then, just like XHTML1 came out ...
- 10-13-2005 #1Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Chicago (USA)
- Posts
- 1,028
A look into the future: XHTML2
http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/05-steven-xtech/
Looks like it will be good... too bad it probably wont be in wide use until 2020 and there will be XHTML10 by then, just like XHTML1 came out in 2000 and still isn't in wide use.
- 10-13-2005 #2Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Ft. Polk, LA
- Posts
- 796
I'm curious to know how xhtml10 could be in use before xhtml2
I'm also curious to know why I should use xhtml instead of html, there really isn't much difference that I can see other than needing to close every tag.
- 10-13-2005 #3Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Chicago (USA)
- Posts
- 1,028
http://www.w3schools.com/xhtml/xhtml_why.asp
Pretty much to get rid of tag soup. Also it should be easier for people who make things like code folding since there's no tag that just opens and never closes.
- 10-13-2005 #4Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Ft. Polk, LA
- Posts
- 796
Meh I still don't see much point in writing xhtml over (valid) html. I despise xml and all it's bloat, no need to jumble it up with html which is fine as it is if it's valid and proper. I never use "code folding" either. Guess I still won't "migrate" to xhtml
Reply With Quote 
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
