Results 41 to 44 of 44
all i was trying to say was that i didnt see YOUR point on illegal surveilence since that entails actual tracking putting up the technology to track is not surveilence. ...
- 10-27-2005 #41
all i was trying to say was that i didnt see YOUR point on illegal surveilence since that entails actual tracking putting up the technology to track is not surveilence. second privacy doesnt exist for you to get all paranoid about. third i have been coming to this forum long enough for moderators to know me and for you to accuse me of trolling is annoying and insulting.

just so you know what the word means
sur·veil·lance Audio pronunciation of "surveillance" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (sr-vlns)
n.
1. Close observation of a person or group, especially one under suspicion.
2. The act of observing or the condition of being observed
- 10-27-2005 #42
Carlos,
If you read more carefully you will see that it wasn't an accusation but a question to a moderator (i.e., he/she can decide after reading the thread.)
I disagree and I do know the meaning of the word. Creating the conditions to be able to pursue surveilance is what you and I disagree with. I think it is wrong while you have no problems with that... Can we leave it at that?putting up the technology to track is not surveilence
I already agreed with that one Carlos and threw my hands in the air if you read carefully... Though, that doesn't necessarily makes it right...privacy doesnt exist for you to get all paranoid about.
By the way, I also live in Oklahoma and I know where you live so be ready!
Just kidding! I will pay for beers...
-D-
Registered User # 402675
- 10-28-2005 #43
- 10-28-2005 #44Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 83
Ye.
Originally Posted by carlosponti


Reply With Quote
