Results 1 to 10 of 44
just been reading techiemoe's site thought it was quite fascinating.definitely worth a read
if anybody's interested
andy...
- 10-31-2005 #1
techiemoe's site
just been reading techiemoe's site thought it was quite fascinating.definitely worth a read
if anybody's interested
andySLOMO: acer extensa 5235 2.2ghz,2gb ram 160gb hdd wireless
SPEEDY: homebrew desktop,Amd x2 dualcore,2gb ram,500gb +1tb( 2x500gb) hdd suse 11.3,32mb fibreline
registered linux user #401845
- 10-31-2005 #2
is techieMoe's site the one in techieMoe's signature here?
http://www.techiemoe.com/techmain.htm
- 10-31-2005 #3
yep that's the one,quite fascinating
SLOMO: acer extensa 5235 2.2ghz,2gb ram 160gb hdd wireless
SPEEDY: homebrew desktop,Amd x2 dualcore,2gb ram,500gb +1tb( 2x500gb) hdd suse 11.3,32mb fibreline
registered linux user #401845
- 10-31-2005 #4
Yep, that's my site in my signature. Glad you enjoyed it.
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 10-31-2005 #5
just thought i'd give it a plug as i'd like to have the time to do something like that,but, with 4 children
it's quite difficult.
andySLOMO: acer extensa 5235 2.2ghz,2gb ram 160gb hdd wireless
SPEEDY: homebrew desktop,Amd x2 dualcore,2gb ram,500gb +1tb( 2x500gb) hdd suse 11.3,32mb fibreline
registered linux user #401845
- 10-31-2005 #6
techieMoe
i've just had a look. it looks very good - the flame retardent page may well turn out to be worth a visit even for those who aren't interested in linux or OS's :P . i'll look forward to that.
just a small point, but you may like to change the name of mandrake to mandriva
- 10-31-2005 #7Well, the versions of Mandrake that I reviewed were still called "Mandrake" at that time. If I ever review "Mandriva" I will make a seperate entry for it.
Originally Posted by GNOME_n00b
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 10-31-2005 #8ok. i guess it must have changed from mandrake to mandriva for the 2005 LE version. i've got version 10, but i can't find the disk.
Originally Posted by techieMoe
i'm very surprised mandrake gets 1 star and suse 10 gets 3 starts. suse 10 has tons of bugs. kdm doesn't work, beagle doesn't work as it should, the upgrade thingy in the panel refuses to go away, naultilus crashes after doing a search, etc. mandrake has always worked flawlessly for me. i guess that this is a candidate for the flame retardent :P
- 10-31-2005 #9Keep in mind that my reviews are done on my hardware and I don't guarantee anyone else will get the same results with any one distribution. Also keep in mind these are more "rants" than "reviews" because they're by no means meant to be fair/balanced/etc...
Originally Posted by GNOME_n00b
On my hardware Mandrake 10 (both Community and Final) were completely unusable due to bugs, whereas SuSE 9-10 ran smoothly with no perceivable problems. To each their own.
Registered Linux user #270181
TechieMoe's Tech Rants
- 10-31-2005 #10
yup, i had read and understood the blurb in the header section(the part where you gave an overview of your intentions for the reviews etc) intently before i read some of the reviews


Reply With Quote
