Results 1 to 10 of 152
ok, this comes straight from another forum, and has about a 10 page disscusion, what you guys think
i think that it doesnt, because .999~ will never get to be ...
- 11-02-2005 #1Linux User
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 473
Does .999~=1?
ok, this comes straight from another forum, and has about a 10 page disscusion, what you guys think
i think that it doesnt, because .999~ will never get to be 1
- 11-02-2005 #2Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Odessa, FL
- Posts
- 586
i agree...it doesn't equal 1, but it's often rounded to 1 to make things simpler...and sometimes more efficient (easier to write...)
- 11-02-2005 #3Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Chicago (USA)
- Posts
- 1,028
If I was a mod, I'd delete this right now.
/me remebers battle.net forums.
- 11-02-2005 #4Linux User
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 473
LOL its acualy from the clan seks forums (a old war3 clan that proly started the last one)
Originally Posted by a thing
- 11-02-2005 #5
Yes it does. See Zeno's Paradoxes
Brilliant Mediocrity - Making Failure Look Good
- 11-02-2005 #6
I've had this discussion before on another forum. Basically, because of some weird Calculus thing, it actually does equal 1.
Blizzard has a press release on it after a huge debate on their forums:
http://www.blizzard.com/press/040401.shtmlDISTRO=Arch
Registered Linux User #388732
- 11-02-2005 #7Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- Chicago (USA)
- Posts
- 1,028
Look at the date of that article.
Originally Posted by Cabhan
- 11-02-2005 #8
I would have originally said no but this seems to have some solid mathematical backing and I don't even like math.
BryanLooking for a distro? Look here.
"There can be no doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason)
Queen's University - Arts and Science 2008 (Sociology)
Registered Linux User #386147.
- 11-02-2005 #9
Originally Posted by Cabhan
Seriously though, it is just normal calculus.Brilliant Mediocrity - Making Failure Look Good
- 11-02-2005 #10
That proof is invalid (I think
). It only appears valid because people find it hard to imagine the endless number of 9's after the decimal point and so make computational errors when they try to think about it. This is a common problem that arises when trying to think about infinities. For example, infinity minus infinity is not zero -- mathematicians would call it "undefined". Similary with zero divided by zero.
0.999999...... is not 1. It's just as close as you can get without actually being 1.
I think.....
Registered Linux user #388328 || Registered LFS user #15880
AMD 64 X2 4600+ :: 2X1GB DDR2 800 :: GeForce 9400 GT 512MB :: ASUS M2N32 Deluxe :: 4X250GB SATAII
Need instant help? Try us on IRC -- #linuxforums on freenode


Reply With Quote
