Results 1 to 10 of 10
Im just enquiring if anyone here has used kate os, in particularly what they think of it. Im thinking of putting it on the main workstation to replace rh8(yep im ...
- 11-02-2005 #1Linux User
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 369
Kate OS
Im just enquiring if anyone here has used kate os, in particularly what they think of it. Im thinking of putting it on the main workstation to replace rh8(yep im sick of the kernel upgrades and libary upgrades).
All i want for christmas is a new liver....a second chance to get afflicted with Cirrhosis
- 11-02-2005 #2Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Luton, England, UK, Earth
- Posts
- 639
RH8, whoah, try FC4 if ya want something similair. Kate OS, haven't heard about it before, can ya give a link?
- 11-02-2005 #3
http://kateos.org/
BryanLooking for a distro? Look here.
"There can be no doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason)
Queen's University - Arts and Science 2008 (Sociology)
Registered Linux User #386147.
- 11-02-2005 #4Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Luton, England, UK, Earth
- Posts
- 639
Looks pretty good, but doesn't look like it is anything new, like the way xfce looks on default, though.
- 11-02-2005 #5
That is a common complaint -- people assume that just because it is a different distro that the DE/WM will be vastly different. It's just XFCE. XFCE on Gentoo is the same as XFCE on Slackware.
- 11-02-2005 #6Linux User
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 369
no im just arsed about the package mangement system the wm im not that arsed about
Originally Posted by lakerdonald
yep ive maintained it for years....its a pain, and i run fc4 on the lappy how ever i want a non-bloated distro with out too much being cut out. more power to games and other apps. It seems to come with ciro so itll be goot for offloading 2d graphics to my video card
Originally Posted by onlinebacon All i want for christmas is a new liver....a second chance to get afflicted with Cirrhosis
- 11-03-2005 #7I was referring to onlinebacon's comment, not yours.
Originally Posted by winter
- 11-05-2005 #8Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Luton, England, UK, Earth
- Posts
- 639
Yeah, I was trying to say that, not sure if it came out right though :s
- 10-22-2006 #9Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 0
KateOS 3.0 Live unable to connect to Internet
I have a cable internet connection via a wireless router. I have no trouble connecting to the internet either from a notebook that connects wirelessly to the router or from a PC connected to the router via a LAN cable. In particular, this LAN connected PC can connect to the internet when I boot the PC using several different Linux live CDs (e.g. SLAX, MEPIS etc.).
However, the KateOS 3.0 Live CD cannot connect to the internet. After the PC boots up, I run "netconfig" and select the DHCP option. After this the "ifconfig" command shows that the PC has received the correct IP address (192.168.2.2) but when I start Firefox I cannot connect to any web sites.
Any ideas as to what the problem might be??
It seems a great pity that KateOS is unable to connect to the internet while most other Live Linux CDs do this automatically without any configuration by the user.
Thanks in advance
- 10-23-2006 #10Just Joined!
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 11
Looks kind of like Ubuntu.
I like the little glider at the bottom!


Reply With Quote
