Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
Hehe, I am not allowed internet in my bedroom when I get to the new house we are moving into Anyone Know a good distro with a decent package manager ...
  1. #1
    Linux Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Luton, England, UK, Earth
    Posts
    639

    Another quick question from the Baconator :D

    Hehe,

    I am not allowed internet in my bedroom when I get to the new house we are moving into

    Anyone Know a good distro with a decent package manager that doesnt need the internet?

    Has to be a fast distro, please and techinal

  2. #2
    Linux Guru dylunio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    4,157
    Ach, you still haven't got them to give you internt?

    Suse commes with pretty much everything under the sun...but isn't very technical (shudder...YaST). On the other hand a distro like Slackware is commes with all you need for a computer...but isn't as good if you want the kitchen sink too like with Suse.

    Personnaly I'd say slack...but's it's slightly lacking if you want the kitchen sink too
    Registered Linux User #371543!
    Get force-get May The Source Be With You
    /dev/null
    /dev/null2

  3. #3
    Linux Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Luton, England, UK, Earth
    Posts
    639
    Hmmm... I guess slack would be OK, cos .tgz packages would probably do what I want to do. Are there actually any advanced rpm distros?

  4. #4
    Linux Newbie GNOME_n00b's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    142
    Quote Originally Posted by onlinebacon
    Hmmm... I guess slack would be OK, cos .tgz packages would probably do what I want to do. Are there actually any advanced rpm distros?
    rpmdrake(ie the package manager) in mandriva is pretty good.

  5. #5
    Linux Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Luton, England, UK, Earth
    Posts
    639
    OKey dokey, thanks everyone, done some looking and it is fedora, damnsmalllinux or slackware for me

    Thanks a lot

  6. #6
    Linux Newbie GNOME_n00b's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    142
    what package amanager are you going to use for fedora? don't bother with yum or apt/synaptic because they're completely useless without an internet connection. i use a package manager called Smart - this is good for what you want.

  7. #7
    Linux Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Luton, England, UK, Earth
    Posts
    639
    Cool, smart it is Thanks for that

    Edit: And a quick question, would it be better if I had a seprate home, instead of just root and swap, not sure how fedora updates when fc5 comes around

  8. #8
    Linux Guru dylunio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    4,157
    If you intend playing around with a bunch of distro's you may want to share /home by putting it on a separate partition, though this can have problems when it commes to the configuration files in /home, but this is only realy applicable if you have more than one distro on at once (in this situation I have a partition full of my files that I mount in /home/dylunio/files - that way my settings don't get messed up when I use one of my other distro's).

    dylunio
    Registered Linux User #371543!
    Get force-get May The Source Be With You
    /dev/null
    /dev/null2

  9. #9
    Linux Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Luton, England, UK, Earth
    Posts
    639
    Okey Dokey, read around and made my final decision, no dual or tri booting cos it is a waste of time for me, Fedora Core is mine, muhahahahaha.

    And KANOTIX for some convertin' :P

  10. #10
    Linux Newbie GNOME_n00b's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    142
    you may want to share /home by putting it on a separate partition, though this can have problems when it commes to the configuration files in /home
    what problem are they? i have home in a separate partition.


    onlinebacon

    i suggested Smart because the package manager that comes with fedora is ultra basic and completely rubbish - it doesn't allow any flexibility whatsoever (can't install individual packages, can't have any other rpm source other than the disk that fedora is supplied on, zero(literally!!) configuration options, etc etc). thats why you'll have to add your own favourite package manager. so because i couldn't choose yast or rpmdrake, i chose Smart.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •