Results 21 to 23 of 23
Originally Posted by jaboua
Haha, that's almost what I've about to say, just with me it's fluxbox instead of fvwm. I never got FVWM look any nice . Fluxbox is ...
- 12-31-2005 #21Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Odessa, FL
- Posts
- 586
I've used fvwm-crystal before, I agree that regular fvwm is very difficult (or time consuming) to make look good. fvwm-crystal has several pre-set fvwm styles that look very nice and are easy to switch between
Originally Posted by jaboua 
In arch (underground), it's in the unstable repository as "fvwm-crystal"
- 12-31-2005 #22
I usually compile smaller packages from source (for example, libraries) and I usually try to assess how many dependencies a given package has before deciding to take the wild and woolly approach. Actually, I like compiling from source: it's interesting to see what you end up with. I usually:
./configure
su
<password>
make && make install && make clean
I also use urpmi for bigger 'complex' apps.
As for guis I love them! With all that memory and disk space, why not use one? Of course I only have a desktop box, so I would say that!I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
- 12-31-2005 #23
well, since i can't get gentoo working on my lappy i can't use portage

i have debian on my lappy as well which limits my source usage. although on my SuSE partition, i do compile as much source as possible.
Here's why Linux is easier than Windows:
Package Managers! Apt-Get and Portage (among others) allow users to install programs MUCH easier than Windows can.
Hardware Drivers. In SuSE, ALL the hardware is detected and installed automatically! How is this harder than Windows' constant disc changing and rebooting?


Reply With Quote
