Results 11 to 20 of 20
Standardization could be good for some, but I think its important to keep Linux more the way it is and like techiemoe said, we don't want dictatorship, otherwise why not ...
- 01-12-2006 #11
Standardization could be good for some, but I think its important to keep Linux more the way it is and like techiemoe said, we don't want dictatorship, otherwise why not just go back to windows? Linux is about learning, if we make everything so easy, then we're just going the way of windows.
- 01-12-2006 #12So you are suggesting that EVERY distro come with X, Gtk, Qt, KDE, and Gnome by default?
Originally Posted by chopin1810
That's a horrible idea. Many new-user distros already do this, and many of us prefer to have a say in what we have installed. If you're managing a server, why do you need an X Server if you don't want one?
In addition, most distros come with a package manager that will handle dependencies for you. I know that Gentoo, Debian, and SuSE have all handled this admirably, and I believe that even FC's yum does dependency-handling. The main exception I can see is Slackware, and you made that choice when you choose it.
I haven't had dependency problems in months thanks to these systems.DISTRO=Arch
Registered Linux User #388732
- 01-13-2006 #13Linux User
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 369
attully the/mnt and /media thging were standerds laid out by the unix standards groups. Either any unix based os can use /mnt for external media or /media for external media
Originally Posted by jaboua All i want for christmas is a new liver....a second chance to get afflicted with Cirrhosis
- 01-13-2006 #14Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 1,431
OK, good to know... I always thought it was the FHS.
Originally Posted by winter
- 01-13-2006 #15Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 542
NO, I'm just saying that dependencies should be standardized so when you try to install something you don't get OOPS can't find dependency B OOPS can't find dependency Z OOPS can't find dependency D OOPS can't find dependency H OOPS can't find dependency A and have to go dependency-hunting all day... that's a problem with Linux, to install Joe's program, you need Bob's kernel hack, but for Bob's kernel hack, you've got to have Suzy's patches, but Suzy's patches only work with a year-old kernel, unless you get Mike's patches to Suzy's patches, but even then, those conflict with Jeff's drivers, which can be resolved only by installing Nancy's patches... THAT'S what I'm talking about, on a more technical level...
Originally Posted by Cabhan
- 01-13-2006 #16
I dunno which kernel you use, but I have NEVER needed kernel patches to install software.
And besides, the main dependencies I've found are, in fact, X, Gtk, Qt, etc. I'm not sure what you intend to standardize if not these.
And in conclusion, this is why Frozen Bubble mastery should be used to determine the next President of the United States.DISTRO=Arch
Registered Linux User #388732
- 01-13-2006 #17
Amen to the Frozen Bubble statement.
- 01-15-2006 #18Linux Engineer
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 1,431
Sounds like a great idea
Originally Posted by oosterhouse
- 01-15-2006 #19
the ironic thing is that we linux users want to see open standards (ODF being one), yet the entire philosophy of linux would fall to bits if we standardized. what's good for one person isn't good for the next.
don't quote me on any of that, i'm just appreciating the irony of our predicament.Here's why Linux is easier than Windows:
Package Managers! Apt-Get and Portage (among others) allow users to install programs MUCH easier than Windows can.
Hardware Drivers. In SuSE, ALL the hardware is detected and installed automatically! How is this harder than Windows' constant disc changing and rebooting?
- 01-15-2006 #20Linux Enthusiast
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 542
Yeah... which is why I think the distribution system works wonderfully here... you've got two extremes, Xandros and Slackware, but all distros have a purpose for SOMEBODY... there's so much choice... I happen to like commercial distros better, like SUSE, because there's a more stable look-and-feel and I don't need to customize everything... I like to have most things just working on a distro without the proprietary underlaying, which I find SUSE to do beautifully... whereas many of you will like to do EVERYTHING yourself... but there's a distro for everybody, and that's why the system works.
Originally Posted by d38dm8nw81k1ng


Reply With Quote
