Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 19 of 19
I use Arch....I was a past Gentoo user and really enjoyed Gentoo as well, but the long install/upgrade times were just becoming inconvenient. Arch seems to have a similar approach ...
  1. #11
    Linux Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Odessa, FL
    Posts
    586
    I use Arch....I was a past Gentoo user and really enjoyed Gentoo as well, but the long install/upgrade times were just becoming inconvenient.

    Arch seems to have a similar approach to Gentoo (start with little and build) so I gave it a shot.

    I've been using it for a little over 2 months, after using Gentoo for 9 months, and really like it. I think this is the distro I'm sticking with for a long while

  2. #12
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    85
    This is definately my next distro to try...heard nothing but good about it!

  3. #13
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    104

    amazing

    arch linux is my fav distro. the only thing though is cos its only a few years old it may have a buggy installation. 0.7 works perfectly but if u try 0.7.1 u will go into problems. u will be perfectly fine if u chosse to only install the base packages though and install the rest from pacman.

  4. #14
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    14
    well....famous last words are...famous last words

    Went through the install of *just* the base packages and started to run into some errors. I think it may be my fault though. I need to make sure I have the jumpers set right on the hard drives

    It was late and I am sure I did something wrong along the way. Gonna give it another go tonight and see what happens.

    The install was a lot similar to Slackware which I like.

    Now...if I run into problems with the install should I just post the questions here or start a new thread? Start a new thread would probably be better.

  5. #15
    Linux Guru techieMoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,496
    Quote Originally Posted by cadkins
    Now...if I run into problems with the install should I just post the questions here or start a new thread? Start a new thread would probably be better.
    Yes. Please start a new thread.
    Registered Linux user #270181
    TechieMoe's Tech Rants

  6. #16
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by techieMoe
    Yes. Please start a new thread.
    will do capin'

    I think I figured out what I was doing wrong so hopefully everything will go smoothly ( or more smooth ) tonight.

    Thanks for all the advice and stuff so far. It's nice to see a very active Linux board. I used to come here before the redo and it was good but not this good.

    Thanks!

  7. #17
    Just Joined! ticklu2deth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by cadkins
    will do capin'

    I think I figured out what I was doing wrong so hopefully everything will go smoothly ( or more smooth ) tonight.

    Thanks for all the advice and stuff so far. It's nice to see a very active Linux board. I used to come here before the redo and it was good but not this good.

    Thanks!
    Keep us informed of your progress. You guys are making me want to try it now!

  8. #18
    Linux Engineer
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,431
    Quote Originally Posted by spencerf
    that being said I wish the install had a compile your own kernel like gentoo because the kernel, from what I've seen, is a completely modularized kernel and I personally like some things embedded and some modules and I like to only have stuff I need not the other stuff. But you can compile your own kernel if you so choose after the install.
    It does have that choice, when you choose a kernel choose "2.6 src" or something like that, it will extract the kernel sources to your arch install and let you switch vt and do the dirty work

    I think Arch is wonderful, I think I first gave it a real try in september or something... I have switched distros a bit after that but I always ended up back on Arch (and yes, I'm on Arch now). There are many things I like about it, bleeding edge packages (KDE 3.5.0 packages showed up in the respiratory's before the official release announcement for example), it's light and quick, nice packagemanager, I recently tried making a few PKGBUILDs (PKGBUILDs works kind of like the makefiles in ports) and submitted to AUR, it's very easy ...

  9. #19
    Linux Guru bryansmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    /Ontario/Canada
    Posts
    2,621
    Quote Originally Posted by jaboua
    ...I recently tried making a few PKGBUILDs (PKGBUILDs works kind of like the makefiles in ports) and submitted to AUR, it's very easy ...
    I tried that too...wow, are they ever strict with formatting. I was thrown off at first but I do realize that there has to be a level of conformity and consistency.

    Bryan
    Looking for a distro? Look here.
    "There can be no doubt that all our knowledge begins with experience." - Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason)
    Queen's University - Arts and Science 2008 (Sociology)
    Registered Linux User #386147.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •