So, imagine this situation: You're reading the forums and you notice a post that no-one's replied to yet. You know part of the answer, but not enough to solve the whole problem. Should you post to the thread or not?
At first it seems like an easy answer: you should post, because that has the advantage of a) showing the original poster (especially if they're new to the forums) that people
are looking at their problem (we all know how disheartening it can be to find that no-one's answered your post) and b) that bit of knowledge you provide might be the bit that's missing from someone else's explanation - between you and the next person to post, you might create a full answer, but neither of you would be able to do it alone.
However, I suspect that the gurus on the forums are more likely to look at threads with no replies, on the basis that they don't have time to solve every problem, and if there've been replies already then there's probably someone else already dealing with the problem. Thus it would be a waste of the guru's valuable time to work out what the thread is all about, and whether they need to add anything. I'm already finding
myself doing that, and I'm miles away from being able to solve any problem, or even a quarter of the things that come up*...
So, back on the original problem: If you post to the thread, you add that bit of knowledge, and reassure the poster that people care, but you make it less likely that someone who can solve the whole problem will look at the thread. So what're people's thoughts on this - should you post or not?
Toodle-oo
Giles
*If I'm honest, I suspect that for me it's more a matter of wanting to make myself feel good by being the "knight in shining armour" for the poster

If I get in first, it makes me look good...