Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 26 of 26
Yes it's HT. Not sure if the ram has got anything to do with it... 1.5GB corsair and the ram is run in dual-channel mode....
  1. #21
    Linux User netstrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    474
    Yes it's HT. Not sure if the ram has got anything to do with it... 1.5GB corsair and the ram is run in dual-channel mode.

  2. #22
    Linux Enthusiast apoorv_khurasia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Laurasia
    Posts
    624
    I dont think beyond a certain point RAM would matter. I mean its mainly a CPU intensive application. Above a certain threshold RAM size won't matter. Even I think above 512k of L2 cache the differences would be negligible (from cache size perspective).
    "There is no sixth rule"
    --Rob Pike
    Registered Linux User: 400426 home page

  3. #23
    Linux Guru Juan Pablo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    /home/south_america/ecuador/quito
    Posts
    2,064
    jsantos@gentoo-laptop:~$ ./super_pi
    Version 2.0 of the super_pi for Linux OS
    Fortran source program was translated into C program with version 19981204 of
    f2c, then generated C source program was optimized manually.
    pgcc 3.2-3 with compile option of "-fast -tp px -Mbuiltin -Minline=size:1000 -Mnoframe -Mnobounds -Mcache_align -Mdalign -Mnoreentrant" was used for the
    compilation.
    ------ Started super_pi run : Sat Jan 27 15:15:12 ECT 2007
    Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
    Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
    End of initialization. Time= 0.556 Sec.
    I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.860 Sec.
    I= 2 L= 0 Time= 2.148 Sec.
    I= 3 L= 1 Time= 2.156 Sec.
    I= 4 L= 2 Time= 2.152 Sec.
    I= 5 L= 5 Time= 2.148 Sec.
    I= 6 L= 10 Time= 2.156 Sec.
    I= 7 L= 21 Time= 2.148 Sec.
    I= 8 L= 43 Time= 2.160 Sec.
    I= 9 L= 87 Time= 2.152 Sec.
    I=10 L= 174 Time= 2.160 Sec.
    I=11 L= 349 Time= 2.152 Sec.
    I=12 L= 698 Time= 2.160 Sec.
    I=13 L= 1396 Time= 2.204 Sec.
    I=14 L= 2794 Time= 2.176 Sec.
    I=15 L= 5588 Time= 2.184 Sec.
    I=16 L= 11176 Time= 2.128 Sec.
    I=17 L= 22353 Time= 2.112 Sec.
    I=18 L= 44707 Time= 2.060 Sec.
    I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.960 Sec.
    End of main loop
    End of calculation. Time= 42.639 Sec.
    End of data output. Time= 0.184 Sec.
    Total calculation(I/O) time= 42.823( 1.204) Sec.
    ------ Ended super_pi run : Sat Jan 27 15:16:00 ECT 2007
    Put your hand in an oven for a minute and it will be like an hour, sit beside a beautiful woman for an hour and it will be like a minute, that is relativity. --Albert Einstein
    Linux User #425940

    Don't PM me with questions, instead post in the forums

  4. #24
    Linux User netstrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    474
    Sorry I just had to try this. I upped the CPU core speed from 200 x 15 (3ghz) to 214 x 15 (3.19 ~ 3.2Ghz)

    Parameter(%i) to super_pi is missing. Parameter value ? 20
    Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
    End of initialization. Time= 0.388 Sec.
    I= 1 L= 0 Time= 1.188 Sec.
    I= 2 L= 0 Time= 1.352 Sec.
    I= 3 L= 1 Time= 1.280 Sec.
    I= 4 L= 2 Time= 1.360 Sec.
    I= 5 L= 5 Time= 1.356 Sec.
    I= 6 L= 10 Time= 1.372 Sec.
    I= 7 L= 21 Time= 1.352 Sec.
    I= 8 L= 43 Time= 1.368 Sec.
    I= 9 L= 87 Time= 1.376 Sec.
    I=10 L= 174 Time= 1.356 Sec.
    I=11 L= 349 Time= 1.364 Sec.
    I=12 L= 698 Time= 1.380 Sec.
    I=13 L= 1396 Time= 1.376 Sec.
    I=14 L= 2794 Time= 1.356 Sec.
    I=15 L= 5588 Time= 1.356 Sec.
    I=16 L= 11176 Time= 1.372 Sec.
    I=17 L= 22353 Time= 1.324 Sec.
    I=18 L= 44707 Time= 1.280 Sec.
    I=19 L= 89415 Time= 1.192 Sec.
    End of main loop
    End of calculation. Time= 26.834 Sec.
    End of data output. Time= 0.172 Sec.
    Total calculation(I/O) time= 27.006( 0.712) Sec.
    ------ Ended super_pi run : Sun Jan 28 02:21:55 SAST 2007

    Made a slight bit of a difference.

  5. #25
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    ~/
    Posts
    40
    Much better time without Wine. 46.4 seconds.
    Code:
     ------ Started super_pi run : Mon Jan 29 14:51:43 EST 2007
     Start of PI calculation up to 1048576 decimal digits
     End of initialization. Time=       0.656 Sec.
     I= 1 L=       0        Time=       2.044 Sec.
     I= 2 L=       0        Time=       2.340 Sec.
     I= 3 L=       1        Time=       2.336 Sec.
     I= 4 L=       2        Time=       2.340 Sec.
     I= 5 L=       5        Time=       2.336 Sec.
     I= 6 L=      10        Time=       2.336 Sec.
     I= 7 L=      21        Time=       2.344 Sec.
     I= 8 L=      43        Time=       2.344 Sec.
     I= 9 L=      87        Time=       2.344 Sec.
     I=10 L=     174        Time=       2.336 Sec.
     I=11 L=     349        Time=       2.348 Sec.
     I=12 L=     698        Time=       2.336 Sec.
     I=13 L=    1396        Time=       2.344 Sec.
     I=14 L=    2794        Time=       2.344 Sec.
     I=15 L=    5588        Time=       2.344 Sec.
     I=16 L=   11176        Time=       2.316 Sec.
     I=17 L=   22353        Time=       2.288 Sec.
     I=18 L=   44707        Time=       2.216 Sec.
     I=19 L=   89415        Time=       2.048 Sec.
     End of main loop
     End of calculation.    Time=      46.207 Sec.
     End of data output.    Time=       0.196 Sec.
     Total calculation(I/O) time=      46.403(       1.604) Sec.
     ------ Ended super_pi run : Mon Jan 29 14:52:30 EST 2007

  6. #26
    Just Joined!
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    0
    this test was made in working server machine


Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •