Find the answer to your Linux question:
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 14 of 14
Both sides have valid points - but "debate" is tough, because everyone is looking for something different. Something to fit himself/herself. For example, for my desktop I want an idiot ...
  1. #11
    Linux User ImNeat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    N. America
    Posts
    392
    Both sides have valid points - but "debate" is tough, because everyone is looking for something different. Something to fit himself/herself.

    For example, for my desktop I want an idiot proof distro - and Linspire gives it to me. I can't say that for Debian, Fedora Core, SuSe or Ubuntu. I have not yet needed to tweak or edit anything under the hood.

    For my laptop I want a do-it-yourself distro - and Arch gives it to me. I have to do everything manually.

    I think reviewing distros is productive - but debating them is pointless. Everyone weighs the costs and benefits of a distro - but people have different opinions on what's a "cost" and what's a "benefit."
    10" Sony Vaio SRX99P 850MHz P3-M 256MB RAM 20GB HD : ArchLinux
    14" Dell Inspiron 1420N 2GHz Core2Duo 2GB RAM 160GB HD : Xubuntu

  2. #12
    Linux Guru techieMoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,496
    Quote Originally Posted by ImNeat
    I think reviewing distros is productive - but debating them is pointless. Everyone weighs the costs and benefits of a distro - but people have different opinions on what's a "cost" and what's a "benefit."
    This is true. Simply because I don't like Slackware for instance doesn't mean it's not a perfect fit for someone else.
    Registered Linux user #270181
    TechieMoe's Tech Rants

  3. #13
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    107
    Good point, nicely put! Let someone say whatever they want about a distro and instead of challenging them on it, go ahead and have your say also. One is just as valid as another.

    That being said I have not had to tweak or edit anything for etch either that I can think of....

  4. #14
    Linux Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    107
    I wonder how they have "legal" MS codecs when this is part of the lawsuit settlement:

    2. Use of Windows Media Files

    a. LindowsOS version 4.0 and LindowsOS version 4.5 (now
    renamed Linspire 4.5) include the following copyrighted files owned by
    Microsoft: wma9dmod.dll, wmadmod.dll, wmspdmod.dll, wmv9dmod.dll, wmvdmod.dll
    (collectively, the "Windows Media Files"). Within ninety (90) days of the
    Effective Date of this Settlement Agreement, Lindows shall cease any further use
    or distribution of the Windows Media Files in any product or by any method of
    distribution. Lindows, its successors in interest, and present and future
    subsidiaries agree to make no further use of the Windows Media Files in any
    product at any time.

    b. Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date of this
    Settlement Agreement, Lindows shall offer to its Distributors a modified version
    of its renamed Linspire operating system product that does not include the
    Windows Media Files.

    c. Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date of this
    Settlement Agreement, Lindows shall inform its Distributors to discontinue all
    further use of any versions of Lindows products that contain the Windows Media
    Files and that any authorization or license from Lindows to distribute versions
    of Lindows products that contain the Windows Media Files is withdrawn and
    replaced with Lindows' authorization or license to use the modified version that
    does not contain the Windows Media Files.

    d. To the extent Lindows does not have the contractual
    authority to require Distributors to discontinue the use of versions of Lindows
    which contain the Windows Media Files, Lindows shall within ninety (90) days
    inform its Distributors that it has entered into a settlement agreement with
    Microsoft providing that it will cease distribution of the Windows Media Files,
    that Microsoft alleges that unauthorized distribution of the Windows Media Files
    infringes its copyrights, and that Lindows will not provide Distributors with
    indemnity against claims brought by Microsoft arising out of unauthorized use of
    the Windows Media Files.

    e. Within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date of this
    Settlement Agreement Lindows shall review the following products distributed by
    Lindows to assure that the Windows Media Files are not included with such
    products: Lindows DVD Player, MPlayer, and Xine Lindows. Lindows, and successors
    in interest, agree not to post on its website any links or directions to other
    locations from which users may download unauthorized copies of the Windows Media
    Files from other sources.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •