| |
11-15-2006
|
#81 (permalink)
| | Linux Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Portugal
Posts: 194
|
__________________
All Empires rise and fall. The Microsoft Empire has already risen, only one way to go now...
|
|
|
11-16-2006
|
#82 (permalink)
| | Linux User
Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 409
| Can it be fairly stated that the Microsoft/Novell deal is surely going to be challenged in various courts of law for violating the open source nature of Linux? |
| |
11-17-2006
|
#83 (permalink)
| | Linux Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 158
| Has anyone else seen this? http://www.computerworld.com/action/...icleId=9005171
Microsoft is basically admitting that the deal with Novell was the equivalent of protection money (except, of course, the way they said it made it seem like they're just protecting their property, keeping capitalism safe, and all that other crap). This makes me so mad - at this point I'd happily DoS Steve Ballmer's computer or something. What patent did this infringe on, one where they claim that they own the idea of a kernel? Or of an operating system? Or of tux?
__________________ I have sold my soul to the penguin |
| |
11-17-2006
|
#84 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: The Sovereign State of South Carolina
Posts: 4,136
| Just got this from Google alerts... Link |
| |
11-17-2006
|
#85 (permalink)
| | Linux Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 559
| what irritates me about those claims is there is not a single company that can prove there is infringement. See Novel this is what happens when you sign a deal with the devil. I am being slowly driven to throw a pie in Steve Balmers face!
__________________ Blog Registered Linux user 396557 |
| |
11-17-2006
|
#86 (permalink)
| | Banned
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 113
| Ballmer: Linux users owe Microsoft |
| |
11-17-2006
|
#87 (permalink)
| | Linux Guru
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Birmingham - UK
Posts: 1,539
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by joewee | Thanks for the link. The way I see it, this is an old trick. MS see Linux as a threat, so - realising they can't get rid of it from the outside - they will try to 'move into the enemy camp' and defeat if from there. That won't be the last time he says something like this. We all know that Ballmer can't be trusted and we know what his real views are.
Like so many people now, he understands the power of the media. The idea is that if you say something often enough, it will become 'the truth'. In fact, the media don't make the truth, we do ... between all of us. He will fail to destroy the FOSS movement.
__________________ I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso |
| |
11-17-2006
|
#88 (permalink)
| | Linux Guru
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 3,213
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Dapper Dan Just got this from Google alerts... Link | From this article, a quote of Steve Ballmer : Quote: |
Originally Posted by Steve Ballmer We've had an issue, a problem that we've had to confront, which is because of the way the GPL (General Public License) works, and because open-source Linux does not come from a company -- Linux comes from the community -- the fact that that product uses our patented intellectual property is a problem for our shareholders. | Where did that come from ? Microsoft has a problem with Linux violating its intellectual property ? Linux violate Microsoft intellectual property ? Really ?
Wow. I guess you can come up with anything if your name is Steve Ballmer.
You got to give it to him. Is it true ? Is it false ? That's not the point for him. The point is : can I make more money if I make people believe that ?
__________________
"To express yourself in freedom, you must die to everything of yesterday. From the 'old', you derive security; from the 'new', you gain the flow."
-Bruce Lee
|
| |
11-17-2006
|
#89 (permalink)
| | Linux Guru
Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Birmingham - UK
Posts: 1,539
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by antidrugue Wow. I guess you can come up with anything if your name is Steve Ballmer.
You got to give it to him. Is it true ? Is it false ? That's not the point for him. The point is : can I make more money if I make people believe that ? | I have a feeling that Mr. Ballmer's comments will work against him. People aren't stupid and they'll know that he's playing a game. He's trying to bully people into thinking that Linux violates 'intellectual property', but he refuses to define what he's on about. What specific intellectual property? What does he mean by 'intellectual property' anyway?
Linux isn't a 'product' in the traditional sense of the word, so he's wrong there. He tries to make a link between the *nix community and an illegal act. I would suggest that he's talking out of his bottom, and that he should stick to doing what he does best ... nothing.
__________________ I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso |
| |
11-17-2006
|
#90 (permalink)
| | Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: The Sovereign State of South Carolina
Posts: 4,136
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by fingal The way I see it, this is an old trick. MS see Linux as a threat, so - realising they can't get rid of it from the outside - they will try to 'move into the enemy camp' and defeat if from there. | I agree. A possible scenario:
I don't think Microsoft can prove any sort of infringement by "Linux" of its intellectual property. But it doesn't matter. Just the threat of Microsoft bringing lawsuits will be enough for many in business that already use Linux into switching their servers over to SuSE/Novell for the seeming legal protection Ballmer has already said would be a part of their deal. If Microsoft does bring lawsuits against Red Hat, Oracle and the many distros, that will create a stampede over to SuSE by businesses who value that protection, knowing they can continue to use Linux and receive unhindered and legal support. Through years of endless legal challenges, Microsoft could then financially drain all the remainders without much effort. In the end, it won't matter if the other distros win in court because they will all be bankrupt. That leaves most of the businesses who use or want to use Linux largely in Novell's coral. If that happens, the Novell/Microsoft deal will then enable Microsoft to more easily control or destroy Linux as a rival in the server/business arena.
I could be completely wrong though...  |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |